Paul Through the Eyes of the Reformers, Stephen J. Chester. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. (ISBN: 9780802878489) 2025.

Summary: Challenges misconceptions of Reformation readings of Paul and proposes constructive approaches.

At times, one gets the impression in Pauline studies that there is either the perspective of the Reformers, and particularly Luther, or the New Perspective on Paul in its covenant and apocalyptic forms. And one gets the impression that we miss the meaning of Paul if we read him through Luther’s personal crisis and his liberating grasp of justification as God’s imputation of Christ’s righteousness through faith in Christ. We miss Paul’s concerns for covenantal boundaries and the inclusion of the Gentiles.

Stephen J. Chester, in this work, demonstrates the over-simplifications and misconceptions in such views. For one thing, Reformed and New Perspectives share in a much larger interpretive history. Chester traces the exegesis of Augustine, of the medieval scholars and their nominalism and the rise of humanism that preceded the Reformation. He also acquaints us with the parallel to New Perspective scholarship in the rise of Lutheran scholarship, including Bultmann.

Chester examines the careful exegetical work of Luther and his peers that led to a radical departure from Augustinian interpretation. He contends that New Perspective scholars need to reckon with that exegesis and recognize that there is far more than Luther’s guilty conscience involved in Luther’s elucidation of sin, law, the work of Christ, and grace. Chester develops an engagement that recognizes ways the New Perspective depends on the Reformers, ways it intensifies some aspects, ways it makes false assumptions, and ways it is truly in conflict.

Chester also argues that while the Reformers shared a commitment to justifying faith that looks to Christ to receive an alien righteousness, they had varied understanding how this was experienced by believers. In Part Three of the work, he offers an extended study of Luther, Melanchthon, and Calvin. Both Luther and Calvin stressed the idea of our union with Christ by faith. Melanchthon, by contrast, focuses more on justification being on account of Christ. In addition, Calvin, in contrast with Luther stressed union with Christ in both justification and sanctification without confusing the two.

Chester focuses in the concluding part of the work on how the idea of union with Christ may be fruitful in contemporary studies. This proposal typifies Chester’s approach throughout. Rather than oppose interpreters, Chester looks for the places of engagement. He affirms advances in New Perspective scholarship while inviting a better reading of the Reformers. I found this a far more constructive engagement than, for example, the polemical exchange between John Piper and N.T. Wright. His history of Pauline exegesis sets both the Reformers and the New Perspective within a larger context. And through it all, he points us to Paul’s marvelous apprehension of the grace of God.

_______________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.