Review: The Gospel After Christendom

Cover image of "The Gospel After Christendom" edited by Collin Hansen, Skyler R. Flowers, and Ivan Mesa

The Gospel After Christendom

The Gospel After Christendom, edited by Collin Hansen, Skyler R. Fowers, and Ivan Mesa. Zondervan Reflective (ISBN: 9780310175476) 2025.

Summary: An intro to cultural apologetics, explaining how it is done and in what context, and what questions it answers.

Apologetics classically has been the effort to give a reasoned defense (“apology”) for the Christian faith. It is often associated with reasoned argument, proofs for God’s existence, evidence for the trustworthiness of the biblical accounts, of miracles, and the resurrection of Jesus. In recent years an offshoot to apologetics, cultural apologetics, has arisen out of the realization that classic apologetics is answering questions many people aren’t asking. Rather, it is an effort to understand and re-frame the cultural story in a way to which the gospel speaks compellingly as the best way to make sense of that story and one’s life. As one of the editors of this book, Collin Hansen, states:

“Cultural apologetics, then, helps non-Christians want the gospel to be true even before they fully understand this good news. We offer the beauty of the lordship of Christ as opposed to the ugliness of the lordship of the principalities and powers (Eph. 6:12)” (p. 4).

This book represents the work of scholars and practitioners associated with The Keller Center for Cultural Apologetics to articulate the meaning and practice of cultural apologetics. Thus it serves as a valuable introductory text for any Christians wanting to relevantly communicate their faith. To do so, the book is broken into four parts, each of which I’ll briefly summarize.

Part 1. What is Cultural Apologetics?

Trevin Wax opens this section by showing how cultural apologetics is a useful tool in communicating the gospel in twenty-first century culture. For example, he shows how this helps us respond to cultural narratives like expressive individualism. Then he shows how curiosity is a way of caring for our neighbors and how cultural apologetics addresses the whole person. Finally, it displays the goodness and beauty of Jesus.

Then Christopher Watkin, who wrote Biblical Critical Theory, shows how cultural apologetics is as old as scripture itself. Continuing this idea Joshua D. Chatraw traces cultural apologetics through church history. He highlights Augustine and Pascal as exemplars of cultural apologetics in their day.

Part 2. How Is Cultural Apologetics Done?

Alan Noble open this section with a fine essay advocating a posture of grace rather than either accommodation or aggression. Then Daniel Strange, in a chapter on missiology, discusses how cultural narratives are idolatrous counterfeits of the gospel. In response, he advocates an approach of “subversive fulfillment.” He shows how Paul modelled this in Acts 17. First, he entered their world, noticing their gods and he explored, finding their altar to the unknown. Then he exposed how humanly created images are frauds. Finally, he evangelized, showing Christ as the “subversive fulfillment” they had sought elsewhere.

Then Gary Sutanto draws out the implications for theology of an anthropology that understands that humans know but suppress the knowledge of God with hearts that are hard and minds that are darkened. It is not that people cannot believe, but that they will not, except as God illumines their hearts as they hear the message. Ultimately, as Gavin Ortlund argues, our work is to expose unbelief as not merely untrue but unlivable. However, the gospel offers hope in place of despair.

Part 3. What Questions Does Cultural Apologetics Answer?

The three essays in this section focus on the goodness, beauty, and truth of Christianity. First, Rebecca McLaughlin makes the case for the goodness of Christianity, pointing to the goodness of Jesus, and how Christianity, as Tom Holland has argued, has powerfully contributed to human flourishing across history. At the same time, she addresses those who would call Christianity bad. Rachel Gilson then considers the beauty of Christianity, and how our sense of wonder points us to what we can ultimately find only in the beautiful God revealed in Jesus. Finally, Derek Rishmawy explores Christianity as true, the ground of reality. We believe it is true not because it works, but rather we believe it works because it is true.

Part 4. Where Does Cultural Apologetics Happen?

First of all, Bob Thune proposes that cultural apologetics originates in the church. That is, the church renewed and hospitable to outsiders is itself a cultural apologetic. However, many in our secular culture won’t initially darken the doors of the church. James Eglinton advocates for “front porches” ranging from public lectures to welcoming homes, to engage people not ready to enter “the house.” Finally, Sam Chan proposes that everyday life offers cultural texts we can deconstruct and reframe, offering the examples of weekend sports leagues, fitness trackers, many of our movies, catching planes, and doing the laundry.

Final Comments

One thing that struck me is that although this was an edited work, it read with a flow and coherence as if written by a single author. To bring such a stellar lineup together and produce such a cohesive text is a tribute to the editors. In addition, the book offers an outstanding introduction to cultural apologetics, providing definitions, baselines, and agenda. All this is done with an admirable brevity, in contrast to many apologetic tomes. In particular, the case for cultural apologetics as an aspect of Christian witness throughout history rather than a modern accommodation is valuable. Final, the book offers abundant examples of cultural apologetics that preach. Consider the example of the essays on beauty, goodness, and truth in part three. This is an outstanding introduction that will hopefully inspire many.

Review: Star Trek and Faith, Volume 1

Cover image of "Star Trek and Faith, Volume 1" by Mark S. Hansard

Star Trek and Faith, Volume 1, Mark S. Hansard, foreword by Michael W. Austin. Wipf & Stock (ISBN: 9798385235193) 2025.

Summary: How various iterations of Star Trek explored religious and philosophical ideas vis-à-vis a Christian worldview.

I am something of a Star Trek Fan. Not a diehard like another member of my family. I was in my early teens when The Original Series was first on the air. It was the most unusual thing on television, and it dared to explore interesting ideas like the encounters of civilizations and interracial relationships, including the famous kiss. The series reflected the humanism of Gene Roddenberry, yet religion was never off the table. Sometimes it was viewed as benighted beliefs humans would grow out of. And sometimes…

We spent Saturdays in our early years as a family watching the Next Generation. It was pizza night and we gathered around our little black and white TV to watch the latest episodes. Once again, the ideas behind the episodes were often thought provoking. Ideas ranging from the sentience of AI to mandated euthanasia. After this series and the early movies, we grew more sporadic in our following of subsequent series, which, according to that family member mentioned earlier, continues to this day. It’s a franchise that has been going for six decades.

Mark S. Hansard is a collegiate minister with an MA in Philosophy and a huge Trek fan. I can’t help but believe that some of the discussions in this book arose from viewings with some of the students and faculty with whom he works. He draws on episodes in The Original Series, The Next Generation, Discovery, and several of the films to explore the humanistic worldview of the series and its references to religion and Christian themes. And as a Christian, he interacts with those themes. Most helpfully, he identifies some of the logical fallacies and caricatures of faith perpetuated by the series. At the same time he explores with candor the challenges the series poses for Christians.

He begins with introducing us to Gene Roddenberry and the high tech, humanist perspective of Roddenberry. Yet he notes how Roddenberry, perhaps to please his audiences, put Christian themes into Trek. After the first section, Hansard uses a different episode in each chapter to explore a number of tough questions. For example, using “The Brightest Star” episode from Discovery, he explores questions like “Is Christianity manipulative?”. “Is God a cosmic policeman?”, and “is it wrong to doubt your faith?” Then subsequent chapters explore questions like Christianity and superstition, the character of God, free will, and pacifism.

I especially enjoyed some of the later chapters, particularly the two in Section IV. Specifically, Hansard explores messianic themes in “The Empath,” who must decide whether she will sacrifice herself to heal others. Likewise, we consider the death and resurrection of Spock in the second and third movies and the plausibility of belief in Jesus’ resurrection.

Each chapter after the introductory ones follows a format. Firstly, Hansard offers a brief plot summary, followed by a worldview analysis of the episode. He will then explore philosophical issues. For example, considering the Discovery episode, “The New Eden” he discusses the rationality of omnism, the interaction of faith and reason, then considers another part of the episode, the violation of the Prime Directive. Then some chapters include more Christian material ranging from Augustine’s theory of just war (“Bread and Circuses”). to a discussion of ideas of heaven in the Star Trek Generations movie and the biblical idea of heaven.

This is a great book for the Christian who loves the Star Trek universe and wants to think Christianly about the questions various series and movies raise. I can see it as highly useful for Christians with friends who don’t share their beliefs but love Star Trek. Hansard models an approach that can be taken with other episodes. However I wondered how someone who does not share Hansard’s beliefs would receive the book. While Hansard is explicit about what he is trying to do, some might be surprised by how much Christian discussion Hansard introduces. I’d suggest a read of the table of contents to decide if this is the book one wants to read.

The great strength of this book is Hansard’s philosophical background. He mirrors that apostle of reason and logic, Mr. Spock, using these at times to challenge fallacies Roddenberry’s outlook, including such things as how easily his characters violate the Prime Directive. He helps us think critically about Star Trek. Equally, he sets forth a reasonable faith able to meet the advances in science and technology. I look forward to Volume 2!

_______________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.