Author: rtrube54

Review: The Grey Wolf

/ rtrube54 / 7 Comments
Cover image of "The Grey Wolf" by Louise Penny

The Grey Wolf (Chief Inspector Armand Gamache Number 19), Louise Penny. Minotaur Books (ISBN: 9781250328144) 2024.

Summary: Gamache, Jean-Guy, and Isabelle seek to avert a plotted catastrophe, trusting no one but each other.

It was worth the wait. It’s been two years since the last in the Gamache series, Penny taking a year off. The result was a riveting, edge-of-the seat work involving a scary plot in which tens of thousands could die.

It all begins on a quiet August Sunday, interrupted by a series of phone calls to Gamache’s private line. Finally, he picks it up, listens, says “Go to hell,” and hangs up. Not a wrong number but a wrong person, Jeanne Caron, responsible for adding to the suffering of Gamache’s son Daniel as a payback for Gamache’s refusing to bend the law for a political favor. She wanted to meet and called on a number known only to family and friends.

Then more strange things occur. While at the bistro, the alarm goes off to a flat they owned in Montreal. It appeared to be a faulty sensor. Leaving the bistro, Gamache sees a man who is vaguely familiar. At the Montreal flat, nothing was amiss. Except for a jacket, mailed back to Gamache with a cryptic list of herbs in the pocket and a request to meet at a cafe.

A man shows up for the meeting, a freelance biologist with a drug-abusing past. He hints at a terrible plot but leaves it to Gamache to figure out. As they leave the cafe, a driver heads toward them. Gamache leaps to save a grandfather and grandchild. The biologist is killed.

All this sets Gamache and his team in pursuit of the killers, one of whom they find executed, and what Langlois, the biologist, was trying to tell him. But it quickly becomes apparent that Gamache can only trust Jean-Guy and Isabelle. Thus, who is friend and who is enemy is not clear. For example, even his superior, the woman Gamache recommended when he stepped down from the position, is suspect. And Jeanne Caron? Why did she call?

And that familiar man at the bistro? It was none other than the abbot of Saint-Gilbert-Entre-les-Loups, Dom Phillippe (see book eight). But this was no random visit. He leaves a message for Gamache at the village church, a piece of paper connected to the paper in his jacket pocket. And a bottle of Chartreuse at the bistro.

This leads a hair-raising flight to the remote location of Saint-Gilbert-Entre-les-Loups. No Dom Phillippe but they find a map from Langlois. Meanwhile Isabelle travels to DC, the Vatican and an abbey in France. And Gamache continues to search for notebooks Langlois left behind, increasingly convinced that what Langlois died trying to warn him about was a plot to poison Montreal’s water supply.

Not able to trust insiders in the Surete, Gamache goes outside. For example, he offers dirt on himself to a blogger hostile to him for her investigative efforts. He gains the trust of the crusty Mission director, where Langlois sought refuge for a time. The pattern of reaching out to those on the margins, those discounted by others, continues.

But will their fevered efforts be in time and enough? And who is behind this plot? And why? Penny keeps us turning the pages to find out.

The residents of Three Pines play a supporting role to Gamache’s family, sheltering in Three Pines, but little more. Given the focus of the plot, there is little room for development of these characters. That said, Ruth acts totally in character. There are indications of a deepening rapprochement between Daniel and Armand.

And the title? Wolves turn up at several places but key is a story Armand tell Jean-Guy about Saint-Gilbert-Entre-les-Loups, which means Saint Gilbert Between the Wolves. It comes from a story a Cree chief told the first abbot about two wolves inside us, a grey and black one, the first strong, compassionate, and wise. the second, cruel and cunning. The question is, which wolf will win? The answer: the one we feed. In this book, we learn of a grey wolf. And in the after matter, we learn that Penny’s next book, in 2025, is titled The Black Wolf. So, strap in folks, for more good reading ahead!

For Gamache readers, if you want to refresh your memory of the preceding books (and especially book 8, The Beautiful Mystery), you might find my blog post, The Reviews: Chief Inspector Armand Gamache Series, helpful.

The Weekly Wrap: November 10-16

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Image for The Weekly Wrap: person wrapping a book
Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

When Our Kids Like Different Books

An unusual event happened yesterday. I posted about a book I’m reading (Challenger by Adam Higgenbotham). My son commented that he wanted to read it when I finished it. This doesn’t happen very often. We generally read very different stuff, despite all the stories we read together when he was young.

This brings to mind Dave Kim’s story of all the books he gave his son. And what did he want? Heidi! “I Gave My Son the Books I Loved. He Chose ‘Heidi’ Instead” is a touching account of bonds between father and son when reading tastes differed.

That’s the opportunity when tastes differ. If nothing else, my son has introduced me to graphic novels and reminded me of how much I enjoyed math puzzle books when I was young. He reads science fiction published after the 1970’s! I have given him some Octavia E. Butler books as well as my Bradbury and Asimov collections.

Nearly always, he chooses great gifts of books–often things off my beaten paths that usually turn out to be pretty good reads. Because much of what he reads is technical math stuff, he gives me reading lists for gifts suggestions.

The one corollary of our differing tastes is that he has no interest in inheriting nearly any of my books! So an interesting task of these years is finding them a good home through donations and re-selling. And I wondered what I’d be doing in retirement?

Five Articles Worth Reading

I don’t know a single bibliophile who gets enough time to read. “So many books; so little time” is our mantra. In “Maximizing Time for Reading,” Blake Butler offers some great reading hacks for making the most of our time, and for reading widely.

Butler mentions reading Thomas Pynchon several times in his article. I came across this profile from 2013 of Pynchon, “On the Thomas Pynchon Trail: From the Long Island of His Boyhood to the ‘Yupper West Side’ of His New Novel.” He’s a recluse and something of an enigma. I’ve never tackled him and I wonder if I will. Should I?

Antigone, a website dedicated the Greek and Latin classics, reproduced “Machines or Mind? The Essay that Launched the Loebs,” written by W.H.D. Rouse, editor of the Loeb Classical Library series, in 1911. The series is well-known among classicists for 9its volumes in green cloth (Greek) or red cloth (Latin). In it, he enthusiastically answers the question, “What is the use of Greek and Latin literature?”

A particular use of literature through the ages has been to explore why human beings live in a tension of vice and virtue. Ed Simon explores this in the LitHub article “Deadly Sins and Heavenly Virtues: On the Timeless Duality of Being Human.”

This week, Samantha Harvey won the prestigious Booker Prize for Orbital, beating out the likes of Percival Everett and Rachel Kushner. The novel’s focus is on astronauts and cosmonauts orbiting the earth and what they experience. The New York Times profiles her and the book in “Samantha Harvey’s ‘Orbital’ Wins 2024 Booker Prize.” The book was new to me, but I just ordered it.

Quote of the Week

Robert Louis Stevenson was born on November 13, 1850. He anticipates our modern day “thankfulness journals” when he writes:

“Keep your eyes open to your mercies. The man who forgets to be thankful has fallen asleep in life.”

Miscellaneous Musings

I finished Bob Woodward’s War the other day. What most struck me in this week of cabinet appointments was the experienced, highly competent, and dedicated people who are advising President Biden through the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel. There is far more than a political agenda at stake.

I’ve read two books recently that have touched on the friendship between revivalist George Whitefield and Ben Franklin, a theist at best. Each immeasurably helped the other in a friendship that had an incalculable impact on our history. Whitefield never succeeded in converting Franklin. Franklin failed to persuade Whitefield to ease up on his relentless pace. But the two men profoundly respected each other. Would that there were more such friendships.

There has been a significant exodus from X, formerly known as Twitter, since the election. I haven’t left (yet), but my follower counts have dropped noticeably. Many have migrated to Bluesky, which mirrors the look and vibe of early Twitter. One of those migrants yesterday was Stephen King, who wrote, “I quit Twitter. Eleven years, man. It really changed. Grew dark.” If Stephen King thinks it is dark…

I created an account this week and you can find me @bobonbooks.bsky.social. One cool feature is “starter packs” which connect you to others with similar interests.

Next Week’s Reviews

A new feature at The Weekly Wrap is simply a list of the books I’ll be reviewing next week. This is subject to some change due to reading time and life events. Here’s next week’s lineup:

Louise Penny, The Grey Wolf (her latest)

Sarah E. Westfall, The Way of Belonging

Ellis Peters, The Holy Thief (the nineteenth in the Cadfael series)

Elesha J. Coffman, Turning Points in American Church History

I may have one other–stay tuned!

Well, that’s The Weekly Wrap for November 10-16, 2024!

Find past editions of The Weekly Wrap under The Weekly Wrap heading on this page.

Review: War

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "War" by Bob Woodward.

War, Bob Woodward. Simon & Schuster (ISBN: 9781668052273) 2024.

Summary: A behind-the-scenes account of three wars during the Biden administration–Ukraine, the Middle East, and for the American presidency.

I have not read a single Bob Woodward book since All The President’s Men during the Watergate years. In all, he has written or co-written twenty two of them covering every presidency beginning with Richard Nixon up to the present. War covers the Biden presidency and draws its title from three wars that have defined the administration–in Ukraine, in the Middle East, and with Donald Trump for the American presidency.

Woodward begins by recollecting a party with Donald Trump to which he had been invited in 1989. Even then Trump, though not thinking about political office defined his life by fighting, rolling with the punches, and winning. He then fast forwards to January 6, 2021 and the President’s reluctant exit from office. Once Joe Biden is in office, there was an impression that President Trump would fade into the background. The Republicans and the nation would move on. As we all know, and the book records, it was the Trump of 1989 that prevailed. What the book illuminates is the key role of Lindsay Graham in encouraging another run. Woodward traces the coalescence of a campaign around grievance–immigration, inflation, foreign involvements including the badly handled exit in Afghanistan, set up by Trump’s own agreement with the Taliban.

However, much of the book concerns two other conflicts. One is the Russian invasion of Ukraine. What is striking in Woodward’s recounting, first, is the amount of intelligence the U.S, had. We clearly knew more than Zelensky and had a hard time convincing him of what he was facing. What is also striking are the wise and intricate moves to both support Ukraine without escalating the conflict into a global war, or even a nuclear war. Joe Biden, Tony Blinken, and Lloyd Austin played crucial roles. Austin, in particular, may have averted the use of tactical nuclear weapons in a confrontation with his Russian counterpart, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu who told Austin he didn’t like being threatened. Austin replied, “Mr. Minister, I am the leader of the most powerful military in the history of the world. I don’t make threats.”

The book also pointed up the critical importance of artillery to the ground war. Our highly advanced technology often features jets and missile defense. But the lowly 155 mm artillery shell is of critical importance and the US alone did not have enough to send Ukraine. This led to the substitution of more lethal cluster munitions, which the Russians were already using.

The other conflict was the war of Israel against Hamas in Gaza after the brutal October 7, 2023 attack. We learn that the public support for Israel was tempered with private entreaties for more humanitarian aid, as well as tempered approaches to attacks on Gaza. Meanwhile, we learn that outside Iran, few Middle East leaders had anything good to say about Hamas. Their concerns were the Palestinian people. Again, Woodward traces U.S. efforts to both stand with and temper Israeli efforts. Netanyahu felt he had to strike hard in response to Israel’s failure to protect its people. But the U.S. saw the danger of a widening conflict with Hezbollah to the north and Iran. An all-out war would involve the U.S as Israel’s staunchest ally. Again, the combination of deft diplomacy and parrying attacks has stopped this so far.

All this underscored to me how important are the top advisors to the president. This includes those in National Security, the Secretaries of State and Defense, and Intelligence Directors. Given our dangerous world, these appointments are critically important. At this juncture, U.S. troops are not at war anywhere in the world.

The book concludes with the political tumult of the early summer of 2024. Woodward recounts Joe Bidens signs of decline and poor debate performance, the first assassination attempt on Donald Trump, Biden’s decision to drop out of the race and the nomination of Kamala Harris. It also concludes with his appraisals of both Donald Trump and Joe Biden. On Trump, he writes that he “is not only the wrong man for the presidency, he is unfit to lead the country.” On Biden, he writes, “I believe president Biden and this team will be largely studied in history as an example of steady and purposeful leadership.”

I realize that this is a hotly contended assessment. All I will say is that his account convinced me of his verdict on Biden. And I hope time will prove him wrong on Trump for the sake of the country. Woodward has given us, in this, and his previous books, a first, journalist’s draft of the history of these times. There will be much more research, analysis, and assessment. But these “in the moment” accounts serve as a good basis for future accounts, captured while sources are alive to render the accounts. Add to this a crisp, engaging style and what you have is both a good and important read.

Review: Bonhoeffer for the Church

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image for "Bonhoeffer for the Church" by Matthew D. Kirkpatrick.

Bonhoeffer for the Church, Matthew D. Kirkpatrick. Fortress Press (ISBN: 9781506497822) 2024.

Summary: A study of what Bonhoeffer wrote about the church’s identity, purpose, practices, and life together.

When the name Dietrich Bonhoeffer comes up, one might ask, “which Dietrich Bonhoeffer?” At present, their are different “camps” trying to claim Bonhoeffer for their own. While his widest readership has always been among those who identify with one or another church, his works do not offer a systematic theology of the church. What Matthew D. Kirkpatrick does, with the aid of the now-completed set of Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works, published by Fortress Press, is organize this material into an extended statement of Bonhoeffer’s message for the church. While reflecting extensive scholarship, Kirkpatrick writes for the church, making this a text for pastors, leaders, and lay people to explore together.

After a brief biographical sketch emphasizing Bonhoeffer’s pastoral work, Kirkpatrick begins by discussing foundations of the church’s identity. He begins with creation and fall, emphasizing the tragedy of wanting to be like God when we already were. Instead, the first couple turned in on themselves, and we re-enact this in our lives in a shared predicament. But God breaks in through Christ’s work on the cross, God’s living Word. God breaks in, often mediated through others, enabling us to have faith in Christ. Such faith calls us into community with love as faith’s expression. Christ makes our community possible through that love and we meet each other through Christ. Thus our own “visions” of and attempts to build community die. Instead we receive community as a gift through Christ.

Crucial to our community is Bonhoeffer’s idea of vicarious representation. Christ served and redeemed as a vicarious representative, and while the church cannot do what Christ did in redemption, it vicariously represents Christ in service to one another and the world. For Bonhoeffer, this is the basis of pastoral care. This further works itself out in intercessory prayer and the confession of and forgiveness of sin. Intercession is not just praying for others, but praying as the other in and through Christ and is a profound expression of community. In confession of sin, we take on the sins of others, recognizing our own sin, and pronouncing Christ’s forgiveness of the other. A concluding chapter in this section discusses ecumenism, the true and empirical church, and why we go to church as a counter to our individualism. Christ meets us in others.

Part Two turns from our identity to our inner life. Firstly, Bonhoeffer addresses authority, leadership and the priesthood of all believers. The focus is on the priority of the God’s word over human words and structures as the source of authority. This is followed by a chapter on preaching, theology, and the word of God. Preaching is central to the inner life of the church. For Bonhoeffer, this means submission to the word of God, by both those who preach and the congregation. The church comes together to be addressed not by a person but by the living God. Kirkpatrick follows this with a chapter on the reading of scripture, music, and sacraments.

For Bonhoeffer, evangelism is not winning people to Christ but rather a means by which God, mediated through Christ, calls people to faith. Evangelism meant listening before speaking, both to God and the person, seeking to discern God’s word in that situation. For this reason, he opposed programmatic approaches. for him, faith in Christ and his word was sufficient. Likewise, in his teaching on time alone, the focus is on listening to God, both in prayer and in scripture. Each nurtures the other.

Part Three engages the church in the world. Kirkpatrick emphasizes that Bonhoeffer did not focus on rules or laws. Rather, the focus was on God to discern what one must do to follow Christ. This may explain as well as anything Bonhoeffer’s decision to plot to kill Hitler. Bonhoeffer on the state followed Luther’s two kingdoms. However, in the context of Nazism, he also believed the church must address the state with the Word of God. Thus he refused to incorporate the Aryan paragraph as a violation of the Word of God. The final chapter covers his letters and papers from prison. This includes Bonhoeffer’s idea of a “religionless Christianity.”

Few agree with Bonhoeffer at all points. But the delight of this book is in how it underscores the centrality of Christ. Salvation comes through him. Community is possible only in him. Our preaching is for hearing Christ’s word together. Our witness is predicated on Christ’s work of calling others to himself. Ethics is obedience to Christ. Amid the contentions around Bonhoeffer, Kirkpatrick has given us a book at once profound and useful for our life together.

____________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: The Lost World of the Prophets

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image for "The Lost World of the Prophets" by John H. Walton

The Lost World of the Prophets (Lost World Series), John H. Walton. IVP Academic (ISBN: 9781514004890) 2024.

Summary: How understanding the ancient Near East context of the prophets can shed light on their message for us.

There is good reason to take prophecy seriously and seek to understand it. Prophets often prefaced their words with “thus saith the Lord” or “this is the word of the Lord.” We wonder, is there a message for us to heed, trust, and obey? Unfortunately, this instinct can go awry when we fail to understand the primary role of the prophet, the nature of prophetic literature, and its theological significance then and now. In The Lost World of the Prophets, John H. Walton, as he has done with other “Lost World” books, takes us back to the ancient Near East backgrounds of prophetic and apocalyptic literature. Building on this background, he helps us understand the message of the prophets and its relevance to us.

As in other works in this series, Walton unpacks the lost world of the prophets through a series of propositions. Perhaps the simplest way to summarize the content of this work is to list these propositions as Walton outlines them in the book:

Part 1: Ancient Near East
1: Prophecy Is a Subset of Divination
2: Prophets and Prophecy in the ANE Manifest Similarities and Differences When Compared to Israel

Part 2: Institution
3: A Prophet Is a Spokesperson for God, Not a Predictor of the Future
4: Prophecy in the OT Is Not Monolithic but Developing
5: The Classical Prophets Are Champions of the Covenant in Times of Crisis
6: Prophecy Takes a Variety of Different Shapes After the Old Testament

Part 3: Literature
7: Recognition of the Categories of Prophetic Message Help Us Be More Informed Readers
8: Prophets Were Typically Not Authors
9: The Implied Audience of the Prophetic Books Is Not Necessarily the Audience of the Prophet

Part 4: Methodological and Interpretive Issues
10: Distinction Between Message and Fulfillment Provides Clear Understanding of Prophetic Literature
11: Fulfillment Follows Oblique Trajectories
12: The NT Use of OT Prophecy Focuses on Fulfillment, Not Message
13: Prophecy Carries Important Implications for Understanding God and the Future, but Our Ability to Forge a Detailed Eschatology with Confidence Is Limited

Part 5: Apocalyptic
14: Apocalyptic Prophecy Should Be Differentiated from Classical Prophecy
15: In Apocalyptic Literature, Visions Are Not the Message but the Occasion for the Message
16: New Testament Apocalyptic Operates by the Same Principles as Old Testament Apocalyptic

There were several aspects of Walton’s treatment that I felt were of great importance. Firstly, he focuses on prophets as spokespersons for God rather than predictors of the future. When we focus on the latter, we miss the strong focus on the warnings the prophets brought as God’s people violated his commands.

Secondly, the focus of their condemnations was how they breached God’s covenant relationship with them. The primary message of the prophets was to warn of God’s impending judgment because the people had not kept faith with God.

Thirdly, Walton emphasizes that the prophetic books as we have them reflect a process from initial message to transcription to compilation that may have involved more than one person over a period of time. Likewise, the original audience of the prophet may not be the audience of the prophetic book.

Fourthly, Walton’s distinction between message and fulfillment is so valuable when considering New Testament “fulfillments” that seem at variance with the plain meaning of the original message. Specifically, he pleads the authority of the New Testament interpreters and the fact that the fulfillments are things that have occurred. On the same basis, he argues against attempts to predict particular fulfillments of eschatological passages that have not occurred. We, unlike the apostolic witnesses, are not inspired. Instead, we should focus on the broad message of God’s purposes and promises to those who persevere through suffering.

Fifthly, I will just note the very helpful distinction Walton draws between prophetic and apocalyptic writings, summarized in the table on p. 130. I found particularly intriguing the distinction of prophecy originating as spoken word whereas apocalyptic is literature-based.

Finally, and perhaps most significant for our reading, Walton provides a rubric of four types of messages we will encounter in prophecy: indictment, judgement, instruction, and aftermath. In his conclusion, he offers guidance about how we might appropriate each in our present day.

As in other contributions to this series, Walton offers clear and concise explanations that summarizes a vast amount of recent scholarship for the serious lay student of scripture. in notes and recommended further reading, he points the interested reader to more in-depth scholarship. Finally, he gently corrects our misreading of prophetic and apocalyptic literature, encouraging us to keep the main thing the main thing, and not to lose ourselves in speculative schemes.

____________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Word Made Fresh

/ rtrube54 / 1 Comment
Cover image for "Word Made Fresh" by Abram Van Engen

Word Made Fresh, Abram Van Engen, foreword by Shane McCrae. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing (ISBN: 9780802883605) 2024.

Summary: An invitation to delight in poetry while discovering how form and language help make meaning that may enrich our lives.

A recent survey found only twelve percent of Americans had read poetry in the past year. I wonder if many are like friends of my who are put off by one or both of two things. Firstly, they find poetry confusing or obscure. Secondly, they don’t know where to start. By contrast, Abram Van Engen believes poetry is for all of us, an invitation to pay attention, to delight, and reflect. For Christians, he goes further. Poetry may be found in much of scripture, most notably in the Psalms. They both disclose God to us and give us language to disclose ourselves to God at all the turns of life. Van Engen believes poetry is for you and he sets out in this book to show how you may enjoy it and find your life enriched by it.

He keeps it uncomplicated. He invites us to just pick up a book of poetry and begin reading until something catches us. Don’t worry about meaning to start with, just notice what caught our attention, and why, in our lives, that might be. Initially, he invites us to read for pleasure, and at the beginning of the book, shares a number of poems. If we like them, he invites us to pay more attention, and if not, to move on.

For example, in one chapter, he considers poems by Gerard Manley Hopkins (sonnet), William Carlos Williams (three four line verses), Gwendolyn Brooks, Denise Levertov (free verse), Lucille Clifton, Luci Shaw, Scott Cairns, Mary Karr, Richard Wilbur, James Weldon Johnson, John Donne (sonnet), Countee Cullen (also sonnet), and Robert Hadyn. By doing so, Van Engen offers us his own curated anthology, offering us the change to discover what we like, while offering very introductory comments.

While he discourages starting by asking what a poem means, he does encourage us to ask questions of the poems that catch our attention, For example, “Why was I struck by this poem?” What about this poem made us stop? “What gave us pause or pleasure? Was it the sound of the poem? Was it a certain memory the poem invoked or revived?” He then takes us through a very short poem (“This Is Just to Say”) by William Carlos Williams, considered previously and notices how each stanza is a literal room, adding to what has come before about eating plums another has set aside in the icebox. He asks questions about the structure, the line breaks, and the repeated “so.”

Before going further into technical matters, he invites us to think of poetry like a friendship. Like a friendship, poems travel with us through life. Along they way, they show us different things as we change and grow. Then Van Engen turns to form. He considers different forms and how form, rhyme schemes, and content interact. Another practice he encourages is erasing. For example, we erase all but the verbs. Or we isolate the requests in a prayer.

Then Van Engen explores how poets use words to name, the oblique ways they express truth. And he devotes two chapters on how poetry helps us rejoice with the rejoicing, and weep with the weeping. Poetry offers us language to express how glorious our life in the world can be, and how wretched. Finally, returning to Hopkins, “As Kingfishers Catch Fire,” he shows how poems enact life. Van Engen contends that as “the just man justices” so poems poem as we read and experience them.

In recent years, I’ve been on a journey of discovery poetry. Van Engen makes this so approachable, so enjoyable. He introduces us to forms and uses of words and more. Mostly, he invites us to read a lot of poetry, guiding us lightly, asking us questions to help us discover for ourselves the wonder of poetry. And for Christians, he tips us off to a rich vein of devotional material many of us may have neglected. He show us how poetry and the poetry of scripture may enhance and enlarge one another. Read this book if you are in the place of feeling both drawn and daunted by the call of poetry. Read this book with a group, using the group guide provided. I believe you will find that which pleases and enriches you and your friends for the journey.

____________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Cultural Sanctification

/ rtrube54 / 1 Comment
Cover image for "Cultural Sanctification" by Stephen O. Presley

Cultural Sanctification, Stephen O. Presley. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing (ISBN: 9780802878540) 2024.

Summary: How the early church pursued cultural engagement through holy discernment rather than fight or flight.

How ought Christians engage a post-Christian, secular culture? Some opt for a strategy of flight, a retreat into communal Christian life exemplified by Rod Dreher’s The Benedict Option. But others opt to fight to recover what they believe is a lost Christian cultural hegemony, as described in James Davison Hunter’s Culture Wars. Stephen O. Presley argues for a third way, which he calls “cultural sanctification.” Instead of turning to Benedict or Constantine, he turns to the early church of the first centuries, making its way amid the Roman empire, and many competing religious options.

Presley argues first of all that Christians exhibited a distinctive identity that began with baptismal catechesis, formed through distinctive liturgy in worship. There were doctrinal distinctives to be embraced in a rule of faith. And there were moral distinctives to be practiced in everyday life. Conversion marked a turning point between two ways–one of death and one of life. Baptism dramatically marked that turn, a dying to the way of death and a rising to the way of life.

Christians had to define what it meant to be citizens within the Roman empire. God’s transcendent sovereignty and providence framed all. Specifically, this included their belief that God bestowed political power for the purpose of promoting peace and security, enacting just laws that curbed sin, and to protect free exercise of religion. Christians walked a tension between appropriately honoring and obeying Caesar while worshiping God. This included praying for rulers, paying taxes, promoting virtue, while defending religious liberty.

Christian apologists and theologians actively engaged Roman intellectual life. Theophilus of Antioch, Justin Martyr, and Origen are important examples. They had to meet the likes of Celsus, who wrote On True Doctrine, an early example of the ridiculing of Christian belief. Apologists brought together Greek education and biblical training that “plundered the Egyptians,” offering an indigenized defense and proclamation of the faith. They argued for the uniqueness, antiquity, and public good of Christianity.

In addition, the early Christians faced discernment decisions concerning their participation in everyday, public life. For example, what occupations could they pursue and how did they deal with the religious rituals associated with many of them? Likewise, were there leisure and entertainment activities in which they could partake? Also, could the growing number of converts among soldiers partake in military service? In response, Presley argues that the Christians brought a response involving contingency, sanctification, and improvisation. By this, they sought not only to preserve their own purity but to have a redemptive influence through acts of love and pursuing justice.

The faithful presence of cultural sanctification did not always transform society or even result in a peaceful life. During various periods, it meant martyrdom. Rather than losing heart, most Christians persevered because of their hope in God’s coming kingdom and the resurrection. Neither did they lodge hope in the political structures and personalities of the day. As a result, Christianity subverted the established order rather than becoming captive to it.

In concluding, Presley argues that our current, post-Christian culture is not unlike that confronting the early Christians. He argues that their example of engaging the culture, while not perfect, is worth consideration. They fostered robust catechesis and formative liturgy that shape a distinctive identity with society. They engaged intellectually, as citizens, and in public life. And they sought to live holy lives in society, honoring and obeying the authorities while giving ultimate allegiance and worship to God. Thus, Presley makes what I think a persuasive case that we may learn from the early fathers as we seek an approach to culture that is neither fight, flight, or assimilation. Rather, the way of Jesus offers a distinctive path, reflecting our distinctive identity in Christ.

____________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

The Weekly Wrap: November 3-9

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Image for The Weekly Wrap: person wrapping a book
Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

Coueism or a Better Story?

“Every day in every way I’m getting better and better”

Fans of The Pink Panther will recognize this line. But it actually goes back to the French psychologist Émile Coué. He created the fad of Coueism one hundred years ago, an early version of positive thinking. He encouraged people to repeat this phrase twenty or more times a day, believing that our positive thoughts could heal whatever ails us.

In “Stories to Live By,” Alan Jacobs, writing before the election, observed that people were engaged in a form of Coueism. They were writing articles about the victory of one or the other when polling offered no basis for prediction. By their stories, they were “striving to speak a desirable outcome into being.” Some were vindicated; some were desolated. But why do we do this?

Jacobs turns to the late Joan Didion to make sense of all this. She believed we created these stories to live by to make sense out of a chaotic and baffling world. According to Jacobs, it is that or therapy, alcohol, or church.

Yet we are inveterate story lovers and story tellers. What I wonder about is whether we need better stories than the political ones we tell and find ourselves caught up in. Maybe the instinct to lose ourselves in a good book in distressing times is not an altogether bad idea.

Five Articles Worth Reading

Speaking of losing ourselves in a good book, People offered this list of “15 Cozy, Comforting, Stress-Free Books for When You Need an Escape from Reality.” Some are old favorites and others look like fun. And some are children’s books, which we adults need as well.

I’ve loved the books of Oliver Sacks. Maybe it is because in some pictures, he and I could be doppelgangers (at least I like to think). This week, a collection of his letters and the New York Times review, “The Early Loves of Oliver Sacks: Medicine, Muscles and Motorbikes,” captures so much of why this man fascinates us.

The prolific Alan Jacobs also writes about a new book on the poet W.H. Auden, who left England in 1939 for America, becoming an American citizen. In “Auden’s Island” he considers the book’s focus on Auden before that departure, and his prophetic vision of England, the island nation in the twilight of empire.

Then there are those who stayed in England through the war. “We Shall Fight in the Buttery” reviews Oxford’s War 1939–1945. Specifically, it explores the war effort of Oxford academics and how “Oxford’s supposedly daft boffins [including J. R. R. Tolkien] helped win the war.”

Finally, “IYKYK: When Novels Speak a Language Only Part of the Internet Gets,” chronicles a niche of writing where “If You Know You Know” or you end up searching the internet to make sense of the work. I wonder about a genre built on such nich-y and fleeting references. But maybe fifteen minutes of fame is enough.

Quote of the Week

Colson Whitehead was born November 7, 1969. He made this perceptive observation:

“What isn’t said is as important as what is said.”

Miscellaneous Musings

I have an email awaiting a response from a writer asking me to review a book taking a position with which I know I disagree. I don’t mind and even like reading books I don’t agree with. I think I am generally fair about accurately representing the writer’s point of view. In this case, I think I’m interested enough to read the book. But I think it’s only fair to tell the author I disagree and let him decide whether to have the book sent to me.

I’m trying a new feature on my Facebook page, doing 90 second “reels” once a week where I read a piece of poetry. Eighty-eight percent of readers do not read poetry. Maybe I can help just a bit. The big challenge? Learning to read poems aloud. I’ve listened to some good ones–most of whom have some delightful accent, something I lack.

I’m reveling in the latest Louise Penny mystery–I have to pace myself or I would just gobble it up. In The Grey Wolf, Gamache tries to stop a monstrous evil but doesn’t know who is behind it nor who he can trust. And amid all this, there is still room for the sharing of good food and the antics of Ruth Zardo.

Well, that’s The Weekly Wrap for November 3-9, 2024!

Find past editions of The Weekly Wrap under The Weekly Wrap heading on this page.

Review: Hide My Eyes

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Hide My Eyes" by Margery Allingham

Hide My Eyes (Albert Campion Number 16), Margery Allingham. Open Road Media (ISBN: 9781504087384) 2023 (first published in 1958).

Summary: Campion closes in on a serial killer unknowingly supported by a widow with an odd museum and a young niece visiting.

There is a serial killer at work in London. In one of the supposed murders, of a moneylender gone missing, the only clues are a witness who saw an old fashioned bus near the scene with an older couple visible as passengers, and a bloody glove. As Campion is consulting with his friend Charlie Luke, events are unfolding in a quiet suburb that will culminate in an edge-of-your seat ending.

A widow, Aunt Polly has invited a niece to come and visit. The invited niece, is married, so she sends her younger sister Annabelle, who is excited to visit the big city. She contacts an old friend in the city, Richard, to go with her to the house–someone to keep tabs. A neighborhood policeman directs them. Attached to Aunt Polly’s house is a museum of oddities, collected by her husband Freddie. While waiting for Aunt Polly, she looks around and spots an exhibit from which two figures are missing. She also activates a switch for a noisy mechanism. A suave gentleman, Gerry, helps shut it off. He is almost like a favorite son to Polly. In fact, Annabelle’s visit is Polly’s attempt to find Gerry a wife, but Annabelle is too young.

Gerry leaves while Richard is waiting. Whether from jealousy or suspicion he follows Gerry to a barbershop, calling off work and pawning a watch to have some ready cash. Gerry, noticing the absence of a watch, befriends Richard and insists he accompany him for the rest of the day to various bars and restaurants. When Gerry leaves to make a phone call and doesn’t return, and a waiter tips him off to a time discrepancy, Richard begins to suspect he’s being used for an alibi.

He’s right. Matt Phillipson is Polly’s attorney and has caught Gerry committing check fraud with a check Polly gave him. So Phillipson set up a meeting with Gerry to recover the funds. But Gerry, disguised as worker, kills him and lifts his wallet. When he looks at the contents, he finds letters from Aunt Polly. They reveal she knows of his criminal activity. And when she learns of Phillipson’s death, she will know who killed him. In shock, he leaves the wallet behind at a restaurant.

Meanwhile, Richard tracks down Gerry’s hideout at Rolf’s Dump and finds the missing wax figures, the two old people on the bus that the witness saw. While he is at the hideout, Luke and Campion are at the other end of the junkyard, where they find the old bus and further evidence. Then they find Richard at Gerry’s hideaway.

First Richard, then Campion realize that Gerry will return to Polly’s house, where Annabelle is staying. The question is, will they be able to prevent additional murders or become additional victims?

Gerry is a truly evil character–a cold-blooded and over-confident killer willing even to kill the woman, Polly, who has helped him and loved him as a son. Meanwhile, Polly has taken a “hide my eyes” approach to his crimes, which could be a fatal oversight. Personally, I thought this one of Allingham’s best.

Review: River of the Gods

/ rtrube54 / 2 Comments
Cover image of "River of the Gods" by Candace Millard

River of the Gods, Candice Millard. Doubleday. (ISBN: 9780385543101) 2022.

Summary: The story of the explorers who sought the Nile’s source, the clash between them, and their unsung African guide.

OK. I will admit that I am a fan of Candice Millard’s writing. I was hooked reading Destiny of the Republic, and with River of the Gods I have read all of her subsequent books. She has a capacity to help us encounter the personalities of historical figures while rendering a fascinating historical narrative. (I also have a friend, who as a history student, worked at the James A. Garfield National Historic site. She spoke glowingly of her interactions with Millard when she was researching Destiny of the Republic, on the assassination of James A. Garfield.)

With that tribute, what can be said of River of the Gods? Millard’s subject is the expeditions of two explorers and their African guide in search of the source of the Nile. Richard Burton conceived the idea. He was already a seasoned soldier and adventurer who spoke twenty-nine languages. Among his adventures, he managed to enter incognito into the Kaaba, the most sacred site in Islam. He made a fateful choice of an assistant, John Hanning Speke was also an accomplished soldier, an aristocrat, and ambitious.

Having secured Royal Geographic Society support (though not enough) and the support of the head of the mission on Zanzibar, they set off in 1856 with their company. Their differences quickly emerged and it became apparent that Speke thought he should lead. The tale is one of porters who abandoned them, struggles to secure adequate supplies, and debilitating tropical illnesses that laid up both men, and left Burton paralyzed below the waist for a time. But they made it to Lake Tanganyika and learned of a river at its northern end, which seemed a good candidate for the Nile. They could not reach it however (later explorations confirmed that the river flowed into, not out of, the lake).

It was time to turn back. When they reached Kazeh, Speke argued for making a brief side exploration to Nyanza, which he suspected to be the true source of the Nile. He was able to reach the Lake and gather reports of a river flowing from its north end. He was convinced the lake was the Nile’s source. When the explorers returned, they published rival and differing accounts of the journey, with Speke writing critically of Burton.

Despite his great accomplishments, Burton was overshadowed by Speke, sowing enmity. Speke, at the zenith of his fame, secured permission for a second mission in 1860, assisted by James Augustus Grant. Grant was content to be second in command. They found the outflow from Nyanza, which they renamed Lake Victoria in honor of the Queen. They were not able to follow the river the whole way, but rendezvoused with John Petherick, who had been delayed. Speke, in his anger, found other help and denounced Petherick, hampering his subsequent career.

But Speke and his expedition made it to the mouth of the Nile and back to England, to great acclaim. At the same time, Burton continued to argue for Lake Tanganyika. Finally, they agreed to a debate. But when Speke encountered Burton the day before, he fled the scene and went hunting at the family estate, dying when his gun discharged when he was attempting to climb over a crumbling wall.

Millard also recounts a third man on both expeditions, Sidi Mubarak Bombay, a former slave. Bombay turned out to be a tireless guide and a rarity–an honest man with the supplies. He managed the other helpers on the expedition, cared for Speke and Burton when they were sick, and negotiated with the various tribal leaders enroute. It’s very likely the expeditions would have failed without him. He as much as any deserved credit for the “discoveries.” Subsequently, he guided Henry Morton Stanley in his search for missionary David Livingstone and another explorer, Vernon Lovett Cameron on an east to west crossing of Africa. Stanley would later confirm that Speke had indeed found the Nile’s source.

Isabel Arundell’s love affair with and marriage to Burton makes for an interesting side story. It was love at first sight for her and she dreamed of joining in his adventures. They later met and fell in love, but her family would not approve the marriage. She was an aristocrat, Burton relatively poor. She was religious; he was an atheist. Finally they married. And she got to join him on diplomatic postings while seeking all his life to save his soul. A fascinating side story!

But the story’s center is the great ambitions and tragic conflict between Burton and Speke that overshadowed their accomplishments and ended in Speke’s death. Marginalized in life, Burton’s accomplishments, not only as an explorer, but as an anthropologist, scholar, translator, and poet came to light only after his death. Speke, despite his overweening ambition, was properly credited with the discovery of the Nile’s source. In 2009, the Royal Geographic Society finally recognized Bombay’s crucial role in the expeditions. Candace Millard, in River of the Gods, further adds luster to the careers of these three great men.

_________________

Reviews of Candice Millard’s other books:

Destiny of the Republic

The River of Doubt

Hero of the Empire