On Books

Review: Race, Class, and Affirmative Action

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Race, Class, and Affirmative Action" by Julie J. Park

Race, Class, and Affirmative Action

Race, Class, and Affirmative Action, Julie J. Park, foreword by Liliana M. Garces. Harvard Education Press (ISBN: 9798895570456) 2026.

Summary: The effects of SFFA v. Harvard on efforts to advance diversity in college admissions and what may be done.

Race-conscious admission, in which an applicant’s race is one of the numerous considerations in admissions, has been one way colleges have recruited racially diverse student classes. In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled to restrict race-conscious admissions in two landmark cases. These were Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and SFFA v. the University of North Carolina (UNC), Chapel Hill. The impact was immediate and dramatic with huge drops in the enrollment of underrepresented minority (URM) students at many schools.

Julie J. Park, who has studied race-conscious admissions efforts over 20 years wrote this book to address the admissions landscape, the scope and impact of the SFFA rulings, and the tools universities still have to advance diverse admissions. To begin with, it is important to understand how Park uses the term “race-conscious admissions.” She writes:

“In conventional race-conscious admissions, an admissions reader could view a student’s self-identified racial/ethnic identification as listed on the application. However, one’s race/ethnicity did not provide the applicant with any sort of automatic advantage in the admissions process. Instead, the reader had direct knowledge of a student’s race/ethnicity and could use it to contextualize a student’s experiences, enhancing understanding of how a student might contribute to the diversity of a student body. Contrary to popular opinion, being a URM student did not result in automatic admissions” (pp. 6-7).

This is very important to keep in mind for Park’s discussion of the SFFA rulings.

But first, Park addresses some of the ways the admissions system was broken even prior to the ruling, most of this not related to race-conscious admissions but impacting racial diversity on campus. This includes legacy admissions, out-of-state enrollments at state schools, early application and admissions, enrollment management programs, and the lack of diversity among admissions professionals.

Then Park turns to the ruling. What is key here is to distinguish the actual ruling from the hype around it. Specifically, Park notes that demographic data cannot be use in consideration of an applicant. However, Justice Roberts allowed that “nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise.” In other words, readers can consider what applicants write about their racial experience but not demographic data. Likewise, counselors and teachers can talk about a student’s race in their recommendations. Also, despite policies extending this to other aspects of campus life, the ruling only addresses admissions. And universities may still collect racial data, important to Title VI reporting. They simply can’t use that in admissions.

Park discusses other implications as well, but the key takeaway for me was the narrowness of the ruling. However, the challenge is that both legal counsel and administrators will often obey laws that don’t exist, especially in a climate where state and federal governments are actively oppose diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. Park notes that it takes courage leadership to do otherwise.

Park goes on in the remaining chapters to discuss the tools that universities still have (at present). She assesses efforts to focus on economic factors and other “race-neutral” approaches. She commends the model of the UC Davis School of Medicine, a multi-faceted approach. Park considers a number of incremental changes including outreach, contextualized GPAs, “push-out” financial aid offers, or even free tuition programs.

Then she turns to the debate over standardized testing. It’s complicated, but Park teases out evidence that test-optional or test-free admissions do result in increased applications from URM students. While standardized test takers with high scores tend to have higher GPAs, test-optional or test-free students evaluated on other factors do nearly as well. Intriguingly, in test-free situations, readers tend to make a more holistic assessment.

Park also considers the inequalities that must be allowed for in other aspect of the admissions process. These range for extra-curricular activities for which URM students may have less opportunity, to the attention given to recommendations from public versus elite high school teachers and counselors.

Park has focused her research on the effects of changes in diversity on student experience. So it makes sense for her to include a chapter in this book discussing how diversity affects student experience. Notably, she also advocates for diversity in faculty hiring, not addressed in the ruling. She advocates for the structures that support student diversity including cultural centers, living-learning programs and student organizations.

As she closes, passionately arguing, “we won’t go back,” it struck me that one of the most important arguments she makes is for a mindset of abundance. While there are only so many slots at a Harvard, this country has a plethora of schools where a student can obtain a high quality education. State schools could prioritize in-state students as opposed to chasing tuition lucrative out-of-state enrollments. She highlights the investment Mackenzie Scott has made in HBCUs. Surely, if we believe in sustaining our national greatness, expanding the opportunities for all our citizens should go without saying.

One of the backstops Park refers to for pursuing racial diversity is Title VI enforcement. I wonder what the implications of shifting enforcement from the Department of Education to the Department of Justice will be in our current politicized climate. This is a development since the book’s publication.

One of the most useful aspects of this book is to parse out what exactly the SFFA ruling does and doesn’t prohibit. We don’t want to obey laws that don’t exist. While the effect of SFFA was chilling, Park shows that schools still have many options available to them. My sense is that we can take none of these for granted. And we may have to fight for many of them.

I also appreciate that Park, combines evidence-based research with a passion for racially diverse campuses. Likewise, rather, than using the abbreviation DEI, throughout the text she spells out diversity, equity, and inclusion, emphasizing that this is what race-conscious efforts strive for and that this is a good thing. We can afford to be generous and expansive as a nation in the education of all our citizens. Park is right: we can’t go back.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review of other books by Julie J. Park:

When Diversity Drops: https://bobonbooks.com/2014/02/25/review-when-diversity-drops-race-religion-and-affirmative-action-in-higher-education/

Race on Campus: https://bobonbooks.com/2018/11/14/review-race-on-campus/

Review: Heaven and Hell

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Heaven and Hell" by Edward Donnelly

Heaven and Hell

Heaven and Hell, Edward Donnelly. Banner of Truth. (ISBN: 9781800405325) 2025, first published 2002.

Summary: A discussion of the traditional doctrines of hell and heaven that we might flee hell and embrace the hope of heaven.

For many of us who believe in some form of existence after death, we hope it will be in some form of “heaven.” And in many cases, we don’t want to think of the “other place,” unless it is for the truly evil like Hitler or Pol Pot. Many struggle to reconcile the idea of a loving and saving God with a place of everlasting punishment. In this book, Edward Donnelly helps us to “think about the unthinkable” as well as bring clarity to what we know of heaven, how we might be sure of going there, and how truly glorious such a future hope is.

The first half of the book is about hell. He begins by addressing why think of the unthinkable. In addition to the massive weight of biblical testimony, he argues that we need to weigh the sober content of the doctrine, that it concerns us directly, and there is a clear way of escape available for all. He also argues for this study because of the massive unbelief in hell, even among supposed “evangelical” Christians. Underlying all of this is our self-centeredness that denies the reality of sin and the holiness of God.

Then, Donnelly turns to examine the biblical evidence, showing that it is a real place created by God and a place of just and everlasting punishment. It is for the devil, his angels, and for those who do not believe. He shows that it is not Satan but God who rules over hell. But isn’t everlasting punishment too severe? The ultimate argument is that without hell, the cross makes no sense. If sin were a trivial matter, the sacrifice of the cross makes no sense. Likewise, he addresses the contention that a loving God wouldn’t create hell. He observes that God is holy as well as loving. and also that love doesn’t overlook evil. And finally, a merciful remedy exists by which no one need go to hell. Rather, than torment us, scripture warns us of hell that we might embrace the remedy!

Furthermore, the destruction is everlasting, the same word use to speak of everlasting life. He describes bluntly what it is like to be utterly separated from God, from all the goodness even those who do not believe now experience. and he discusses what those in hell suffer. While scripture uses imagery (flames, darkness), the reality is still a real experience of pain, even if not never ending fire. But what are the implications for those who believe? First it encourages us to put sin to death. Then, it means we live with contentment in all circumstances. Third, it calls us to a serious, though not gloomy approach, realizing we live among those headed toward a Christless eternity. Fourthly, it fosters a deeper appreciation of Christ. Fifthly, it lends urgency to our witness.

A couple comments. One is that it seems this book assumes those who have never heard are headed to hell, as far as I can tell. I would argue that scripture is silent on this other than to urge us to reach the unreached. I would leave their final fate to God’s just judgement. The other is I would have liked to see more of a case against annihilation, which is only mentioned to dismiss it as an example of evangelicals who argue against everlasting conscious punishment. While I would agree on the basis of biblical texts, not least of which are the statements of Jesus, that there are good reasons to affirm traditional view, those like John Stott have advanced biblical arguments for annihilation, that I would like to have seen addressed thoughtfully.

That said, this part of the book offers one of the clearest modern statements on the biblical teaching on hell and judgment. Furthermore, it makes the case for why we do well to flee to Christ and for the urgency of our witness.

Then Donnelly turns to heaven. He begins by observing that while many believe in heaven, we find those beliefs are often superficial. He explores both the reasons for our neglect and why the glorious hope of heaven matters. Again, he presents the biblical teaching about heaven. Donnelly emphasizes that heaven exists first of all for God’s glory, that both heaven and earth were created for God’s glory. But human rebellion diminished that glory. God has worked to restore that glory through calling a people, redeemed through Christ. Then he proceeds to show how Christ is the heart of heaven’s blessings. He is the Lamb who was slain and has conquered death.

Donnelly goes on to speak of how we will be like Christ. He makes us perfect, sinless, raises us bodily, in glory and power. Above all, he delights in us. Finally, he speaks of our fullness of joy. We, who are new creations, dwell in a renewed creation, even more beautiful than earth’s greatest beauties. We enjoy family relations with all God’s people–a large, varied, united, attractive, and satisfying family. And we will enjoy both rest and service in worshiping God with all our being and gifts.

I suspect some will object to Donnelly’s unapologetic statement of the doctrine of hell. Yet there are many unpleasant things in life we are better off knowing about. By knowing we can avoid them. Also, setting hell and heaven side by side points up the incredible gift Christ has made possible at great cost. It makes clear both the fearsome reality of hell, and that none of us need go there. God has made available a remedy offering a far better future. If true, we’d have to be crazy to neglect it.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: When God Seems Distant

/ rtrube54 / 4 Comments
Cover image of "When God Seems Distant" by Kyle Strobel and John Coe

When God Seems Distant

When God Seems Distant, Kyle Strobel and John Coe. Baker Books (ISBN: 9781540905321) 2026.

Summary: How God’s path of growth takes us into the desert, the way it exposes our self-will, and how we abide in God’s love.

One of the things that often accompanies new life in Christ is a deep sense of God’s presence, what the authors of this book call consolation. Often, experiences of worship, Christian community, personal Bible study and prayer deepen that sense. Until it doesn’t. How ought we understand and respond to that? We wonder if it is something we did. Then, if that’s not the case, we double down on the things that gave us a sense of God’s presence. Or we look for new practices.

Kyle Strobel and John Coe describe how this happened with them. It felt like they were in a dry place, a desert. And they discovered that these times of desolation, just as much as consolation, come from God. Specifically, God takes us into such times to expose deeper patterns of sin. He also takes us into learning to abide in Him rather than engage in sin management or self-improvement efforts. We learn to trust God rather than experiences or a set of practices. But its scary, just like being weaned.

The authors then address the “self-willed spirituality” that the desert teaches us to unlearn. Over five chapters, they explore different ways the self-will manifests. First, they discuss self-generated passion and experiences of excitement and devotion to generate a sense of God’s presence. Second, they turn to how we deal with brokenness in our lives, either by coverups or by trying to “fix” ourselves. Underlying this is pride. The desert exposes these, inviting us to draw near to be forgiven and loved. Third, we resort to goodness, the path of moralism. We use goodness to win God’s favor and then struggle under the burden of conscience when we fail. Again, in the desert, God invites us to come close and to let him do what we can’t.

Fourth, we try devotion. The authors observe, “There is a massive difference between using God to fix your life and knowing that Christ is your life” (p. 124). Paradoxically, we can either use spiritual practices in a self-help fashion or as a means to wait upon God. Lastly, and this has been implicit throughout, we try to fix ourselves rather than let our awareness of our inadequacy move us to surrender, to openness to what God’s Spirit would do.

The final part of the book, then, emphasizes the alternative to self-willed spirituality. It is the spirituality of surrender, of coming with all the mess the desert reveals. It is drawing near, not to an idea of God but God himself. We come not because we love, but that he has loved us in Christ. The book then concludes with five paths that individuals and churches might take in response. Particularly striking were those addressed to churches as a whole that often fail to address the desert, and to pastors.

I found the honesty about the desert as a normal part of Christian experience helpful. Many of our churches make people feel themselves failing in some way if they are experiencing this. Rather, they should be teaching people “desert spirituality.” Also, the second part of the book was so helpful in identifying our self-help strategies that we embrace in pride, rather than bring our messy selves to God. Finally, there is the wonderful news that all this is to teach us to abide in and rest in God’s love, whether there are feelings or not. God wants us to grow into a resilient trust.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review through LibraryThing’s Early Reviewers Program.

Review: I Cheerfully Refuse

/ rtrube54 / 3 Comments
Cover image of "I Cheerfully Refuse" by Leif Enger

I Cheerfully Refuse

I Cheerfully Refuse, Leif Enger. Grove Press (ISBN: 9780802165190) 2025.

Summary: In a dystopian America, Rainy and Lark carve out a joyful life until tragedy sends Rainy on a Lake Superior odyssey.

I don’t typically select books this way. Looking at a table of new works at my local store, the cover art of this book caught my eye. The description sounded like a modern day odyssey. And the author was from Minnesota. Having had a good experience with another Minnesota author, William Kent Krueger, I thought I’d give Leif Enger a try. I’m so glad I did, though amid the goodness, truth and beauty of the story was heartbreak and terrible darkness.

The setting is Lake Superior in a not-too-distant future America. Societal order, the economy, and the climate have collapsed. The country is controlled by sixteen multi-billionaire “astronauts.” Some semblance of societal order is maintained by pharmaceuticals developed aboard “ships of horror.” Children are rated on a “feral scale” and medicated. And if it all becomes intolerable, a little slip of paper with a drug called “Willow” will help you end it all. And some are having “Willow” parties. Libraries have closed and books are becoming an increasingly scarce commodity.

Rainy and Lark have somehow carved out a joyful life together. He’s a big bear of a man who paints houses, plays bass guitar, often with a local band, but sometimes just to comfort his friends. Lark is a former librarian with a big heart and a passion for books. She runs a second-hand bookstore in a bakery, scouring estate sales for book collections. Lark taught Rainy to sail, going to a place called “The Slates,” where they had a somewhat mystical encounter they believed was with Molly Thorn, thought to be dead. Consequently, they buy and re-hab an old sailboat.

Lark, in her open-heartedness brings home a fugitive, Kellen. He has run away from one of the pharmaceutical ships. Perhaps the fact that he had in his possession an unpublished work of Molly Thorn’s, I Cheerfully Refuse, sufficiently seals the deal and he stays with the couple. But tragedy strikes the night of Lark’s birthday. Kellen has disappeared. After a futile hunt, he returns home to find his home destroyed, and Lark brutally murdered. A stranger, an older gentleman, who he later learns is Werryck, ran the ship Kellen had fled, and has been around the town, and through the book, has traced Kellen to their house. That’s why Kellen has gone.

Not only that, Werryck is after Rainy. Whatever they tore up the house looking for is still missing. So, Rainy takes to his boat. The only destination he can think of is “The Slates,” hoping perhaps he will find Lark there. Along the way, he is joined by Sol, a young girl he rescues from an abuser, buying her with his bass. Together they endure Superior’s terrible storms, scrape together an existence, outsmart a corrupt bridge operator, and search for an old relative who once cared for her.

The novel asks the question what kind of people will we become and what kind of communities will we form when the societal order fails? Along the way, amid the corruption, Rainy and Sol will find outposts of goodness. But what kind of person will Rainy, who has lived by goodness, supporting his friends, become? He faces his greatest test when he becomes Werryck’s captive.

Rainy’s sailing journey on Lake Superior strikes me as a modern-day Odyssey. Will he, in the end, find home? And how will the journey have changed him? Also, not unlike Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower, Enger confronts us with a very possible dystopia, asking us what kind of people we would be in such times. He does all this in a compellingly beautiful story.

Review: Story Work

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Story Work" by GG Renee Hill

Story Work

Story Work, GG Renee Hill. Broadleaf Books (ISBN: 9798889832652) 2025.

Summary: How telling and reframing our stories in writing not only leads to self-discovery, but also to finding our voice and calling.

We not only love stories but our lives are stories. But how we understand those stories, the story we tell ourselves and others about ourselves, matter greatly. And how we become more fully ourselves has to do with telling truer stories of ourselves–not those imposed upon us but those that come from within us. In Story Work, GG Renee Hill takes us through how reflecting on, reframing. and re-writing her own story has been key to her growth into pursuing her calling. And she invites us to follow her example with writing prompts at the end of each chapter relating to the chapter contents.

But first, just a bit of her life (and there is a lot more in the book). She grew up in Pittsburgh in a two-parent family, close to both parents until her mother descended into schizophrenia. Suddenly, hugging her dad was perceived as sexual flirtation. That strained her relationship with both of them and led to an enduring estrangement from her mom. What was she to think of herself? Was mental illness in her future?

As she unfolds that story, she traces her own journey of self-discovery as she writes her story. She begins by inviting the reader to journal and live their own questions, identifying the beliefs that might be limiting. Then she goes on to ask us to look closely at one of the events that reflect self-limiting beliefs and ask ourselves what else could be true. The final chapter in this section on “Roots and Origins” encourages us to take a story of tragedy and defeat and drawing from seven basic plots, developing a new storyline.

Part II of the book focuses on the theme of “Truth and Lies.” She begins by reflecting on the masks we wear and how this hides our authentic selves with our highs and lows from ourselves and others. These reveal clues to our values, and she invites us to write those moments and the values they reveal. One of the challenges of writing our stories, however is that we are “unreliable narrators.” She explores the ways we deceive ourselves and invites us to write on unwanted, repeating patterns and how our responses have changed over time.

But part of our stories is also understanding our strengths and superpowers. What makes us different is what gives us strength. So, she invites us to identify those differences from those around us and how these might be strengths, as well as weaknesses and how we might support the former and manage the latter. Finally, in “Nothing is Ever Lost” she addresses our losses and griefs. She proposes that loss and grief can speak and she offers five exercises to explore loss in our stories.

In Part III, “Voice and Vision” she considers how we might become active agents in our own stories. Hill begins by discussing how “Words Matter.” She illustrates that in a conversation with Aunt Mimi where she learns that “I’m not good at math” isn’t really what she is saying. Rather it is that “math is hard.” She’s challenged to think that she might become good at things that are hard. Here, she invites us to counter limiting beliefs with actionable value statements to achieve aspirations. Then, she turns to “life as a creative process.” She offers a four step creative process to pursue. Finally, in “Love and Fear” she invites us to surrender to our emerging calling. This includes both naming our fears and affirming what we love.

Hill models the power of writing to help us understand and re-frame our stories. In her vulnerable and honest account, she encourages us to shed the masks and self-deceptions behind which we hide from ourselves. She also helps us pay attention to our loves, our distinctives and our values. Then she invites us conceive them as central to the plotlines of our stories. For those who already like to write and journal, this book might lead to new self-exploration. Likewise, for others at one of those junctures where we are re-thinking our lives, this might be a helpful tool. As a society, we need to tell better stories. GG Renee Hill helps us begin to do that with the stories we tell of ourselves.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review through LibraryThing’s Early Reviewers Program.

Review: Early Autumn

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Early Autumn" by Louis Bromfield

Early Autumn

Early Autumn, Louis Bromfield. Open Road Media (ISBN: 9781504073394) 2022, first published in 1926.

Summary: Olivia Pentland, in a loveless marriage in a rich old family, faces choices as the early autumn approaches when she turns 40.

I’ve long had an interest in Ohio-born author Louis Bromfield. Bromfield was a best-selling novelist in the 1920’s, winning the Pulitzer Prize for this work. In the 1938, he returned from Paris to his home town of Mansfield, Ohio, purchasing a worn out piece of farmland that he renamed Malabar Farm, building an elegant home that was the site of the wedding of Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall. I’ve toured the home, camped with Boy Scouts on the farm, and read two books on his early experiments with sustainable agriculture, Pleasant Valley and Malabar Farm. But until now, I’ve not read any of his fiction, which I suspect is largely neglected these days.

The story is set in the fictional town of Durham, Massachusetts at the estate of the Pentlands, a rich but declining old New England family. The central character is Olivia Pentland. Though Scotch-Irish and of a lower class, she had a dark beauty and her own wealth. As a young girl, a marriage to Anson Pentland appeared promising. Twenty years on, she found herself in a loveless marriage. Anson was in love with writing his family’s history but no longer slept with Olivia, Their daughter, Sybil was turning 18, their son and heir, John, was sickly, and the shadow of death hangs over this narrative.

The one person Olivia shares the deepest bond with is Anson’s father, John. He is still in many ways the family head at the Pentlands, even as Olivia makes the household work. His wife is still living, but confined to a wing of the home, having descended into insanity and cared for by Miss Egan, who is secretly having an affair with Higgins, their groom. While visiting his wife every day, John Pentland also has had a close companionship with Mrs. Soames.

During the summer before Olivia is to turn forty, John’s niece, Sabine Callendar and her daughter Therese have come for a visit, staying at a cottage owned by Michael O’Hara, an upstart Irish politician who has built a new estate nearby. Sabine represents the family scandal, having lived a libertine life in France. She is resented by Aunt Cassie, the family Puritan determined to maintain the rectitude and reputation of the Pentlands. But Sabine’s presence is the catalyst for Olivia to realize the confining character of her own life at Pentlands. The loveless marriage, the strictures of what’s appropriate, and the secrets lurking behind the pious appearances. Not only that, Olivia fears her daughter will inherit all this.

Not only that, Sabine brings Olivia together with Michael O’Hara. O’Hara had been riding horses with Sybil. When Olivia joins to discover his intentions, she learns his interest is in her, not the daughter. Through the summer, romance kindles between them. Meanwhile, she finds a bundle of letters revealing a family secret that will wreck the pretensions of the Pentlands. That includes Anson’s book. Then a young man arrives from France who had met Sybil during a visit and is seeking her hand. He’s a man of character and the two really love each other. But this won’t go down well with the Pentlands.

Things come to a head as autumn and Olivia’s birthday approaches. What will she do about O’Hara? About her daughter? About the messed up household of the Pentlands, which somehow has ended depending upon her? Among all those trying to influence and define her, she is confronted with what she wants in her life at this important juncture, and what kind of person she will be.

I liked the way Bromfield builds up to the crisis we all see is coming. In addition, in developing the character of Olivia, we come to appreciate her strength, quiet beauty, and deep sadness. The novel harks back to a different time, a blend (or clash?) of Regency, Victorian, and Continental sensibilities in a New England setting. Written a century after Jane Austen’s novels, I found it had more in common with these than more recent works. Perhaps that is why people aren’t reading Bromfield these days. But this is Bromfield at his best, and well worth the read.

My reviews of Bromfield’s non-fiction:

Pleasant Valley: https://bobonbooks.com/2015/10/08/review-pleasant-valley/

Malabar Farm: https://bobonbooks.com/2015/10/26/review-malabar-farm/

Review: The Eternal Son

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "The Eternal Son" by Robert Letham

The Eternal Son

The Eternal Son, Robert Letham, foreword by Ian Hamilton. P & R Publishing (ISBN: 9781629958637) 2025.

Summary: A Christology focused on Christ’s Person, his eternal sonship, and Incarnation, as clarified in councils and more recently.

Robert Letham has written extensively on the Godhead, beginning with a work on the Trinity. This work is the second of a projected three-volume series on the persons of the Godhead, the first being The Holy Spirit. Having in another work addressed the work of Christ, Letham focuses here on the Person of Christ. However, the final chapter, “For Us and our Salvation” does address aspects of Christ’s work.

Letham begins with three chapters which frame out what Christians have historically affirmed concerning the person of the Son. Firstly, he addresses the “Son in the Divine Trinity.” He summarizes developments between the New Testament and Constantinople, in 381. Discussing the Nicene-Constantinople Creed, he focuses on God’s indivisibility, three persons who are one substance, yet distinct persons. He focuses on the divine order, and the idea of the eternal generation of the Son, that from eternity without beginning, the Son is the Son of the Father. Secondly, in the following chapter, “Before The Beginning” he goes more deeply into the Son’s eternal relations with the Father. Then thirdly, in “The Word Became Flesh,” Letham discusses the biblical evidence of the Incarnation.

Chapters 4 through 8 address the controversies that arose related to the person of Christ and the conciliar decisions, post-Constantinople. One of the things that stands out in the controversies with Apollinaris and Nestorius and in the lead up to Council of Chalcedon is the singular influence of Cyril of Alexandria. Cyril defends the eternal nature of the Son, his taking on of human nature in full union, such that all his actions are of one person in two natures. One of the most interesting ideas was that the assumption of a human nature was not problematic for the Son through whom humans were created in the imago dei.

However, Chalcedon did not resolve all problems and led to new ones. Letham discusses the shortcomings of Chalcedon and the continuing challenge of Nestorians and the rise of Monophysites. Also, challenges arose around the two natures of the Incarnate Son willing and acting as one. Letham walks us through Monoenergism and Monothelitism, including a recent revival of the latter. Finally, he summarizes the consolidation of the church’s thought on Christology in both East and West. To do so, he focuses on two key figures, John of Damascus and Thomas Aquinas.

Chapters 9 and 10 then focus on the Reformation and the Post-Enlightenment. The discussion of Luther and Calvin both emphasized their contributions and how at times they could wander from Chalcedonian orthodoxy. The Post-Enlightenment discussion focuses on kenotic theories–what did it mean that Christ “emptied” himself? Letham also discusses theories of peccability. That is, was it possible for Christ, having a human nature, to sin. Letham argues that Christ’s nature was neither a fallen nature or a nature like Adam’s before the fall. “Rather, he lived in a state of humiliation, sinless and righteous but with a nature bearing the consequences of the fall in its mortality, its vulnerability, and its suffering–but not fallen.”

Finally, after his concluding chapter on Christ’s work, he includes two appendices. One has to do with recent thinkers who have resurrected the idea of the adoption of Jesus as Son, particularly as the basis for our on adoption. The second, promoted by David Moffitt, proposes that Christ’s atoning work was not on the cross but when he presented himself as a blood sacrifice in heaven. Letham refutes both ideas.

I found Letham generally clear in his explanations and discussion of different controversies and councils (he also includes a glossary to help us keep our terms straight). In particular, Letham is good at explaining what is at stake with various proposals, and what stands to be lost. He also offers a good summary, as a Reformed writer, of Reformation developments, probably worth a book in itself. Most of all, I feel Letham writes doxologically. He speaks in his introduction of the hope that we might “Behold, the Lamb!” And I found myself often stopping to do just that.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Nothing Can Separate Us

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Nothing Can Separate Us" by Howard Thurman

Nothing Can Separate Us

Nothing Can Separate Us (Plough Spiritual Guides), Howard Thurman, edited by Myles Werntz, Introduction by Vincent W. Lloyd. Plough Publishing (ISBN: 9781636081731) 2026.

Summary: The inner work of transformation through which God works to bring reconciliation, justice, and hope.

Plough Publishing is releasing its latest installment in the Plough Spiritual Guides series in September 2026. In this case, it is a collection of the writings of Howard Thurman. He was a pastor and theologian who mentored civil rights leaders, including Martin Luther King, Jr. This guide, like preceding ones in the series offers a brief biography of Thurman followed by a guide to reading him, and then readings from Thurman’s works. Vincent LW. Lloyd, in the latter, observes this distinction between King and Thurman:

“If Martin Luther King, Jr. invites collective struggle to transform the political world, to end racism, Howard Thurman invites interior struggle to transform the self. There is no need for a choice between the two….Thurman demonstrates how we participate in God through struggle, how we struggle against false gods, against those individuals and systems and habits of mind that take themselves to be absolute authorities, and how the struggle within and the struggle without are intimately linked” (p. xxviii).

Lloyd thus offers a précis of the theme connecting the nine selections from Thurman’s writings. These selections, titled in the form of imperatives, offer nine ways we engage with God as we “engage the struggle without.” In “Know Thyself” he invites us to live in the present and in the disarming presence of God that strips us of illusions. Then, in “Love Your Neighbor” he connects our love of God and neighbor. He concludes with the wonder of “being completely and totally understood in the presence of God.”

But what does love have to do with our enemies? In “Love Your Enemies” he identifies three types of enemies the poor and disinherited face. He observes that even enemies are of infinite worth to God. Thus, it is worthy to try to make contact with this imago dei in the person’s life. We do this through forgiveness, leaving vengeance to God. Then, in “Choose Nonviolence” he addresses the nonviolent ethic of Jesus in both personal and national life. He offers the simple axiom that “No one ever wins a fight.” He discusses the choice of violence as the decision to will the non-existence of another.

Instead, we “Learn to Pray.” It is the acknowledgement that we do not want to be left to our own meagre resources. The chapter concludes with a wonderful prayer that models our dependence on God. An example of utter dependence comes from the slave experience and the spirituals that emerged from it. “Wade in the Water” speaks of coming to God in our vulnerability, trusting that God will “trouble the water” in healing. Finally, the road to dependency leads us to “Surrender to God.” Thurman describes in first person terms all the areas involved in full surrender to God.

This inner transformation has outward effects. For example, his call to “Attend to Nature” challenges us to “reverence for all expressions of life.” Likewise it results in an “at-homeness in the world.” Lastly, he calls us to “Live in Community.” He warns us against isolation and of ever thinking of “people” in merely abstract terms.

To devote oneself to seek God’s kingdom and pursue his reconciliation and justice in the world is a lifetime journey. We look for final fulfillment in Christ’s return. The wisdom captured in these nine short chapters from Howard Thurman’s writings capture the inner journey that transforms and sustains us as we seek societal transformation. The danger in any form of struggle against evil is to become like that against which we struggle. Thurman writes of the inner spiritual transformation that guards our hearts and makes reconciliation and healing possible.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Did Jesus Really Say He Was God?

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Did Jesus Really Say He Was God?" by Mikel Del Rosario

Did Jesus Really Say He Was God?

Did Jesus Really Say He Was God?, Mikel Del Rosario. IVP Academic (ISBN: 9781514011010) 2025.

Summary: Using methods of historiography, demonstrates that Jesus opponents believed him to be claiming divinity.

Christians believe Jesus was the Son of God, eternally God with the Father and the Holy Spirit. We also believe he assumed a fully human nature, God and man in one person. But did Jesus ever say he was God in those words? The honest answer is “no.” And for some, this leads to the belief that subsequent to his time on earth, the church “made” him God. However, many of us point to statements in the gospels in which Jesus implies his deity in conversation with his adversaries. They believed him to be making a blasphemous claim to deity and Jesus does not deny it. Furthermore, Jesus teaches and acts in ways consistent with a consciousness of deity. But can we trust these accounts to provide us with reliable, historical information?

That is the question that troubled Mikel Del Rosario as he encountered questions similar to those raised above. In this book Del Rosario focuses on two passages from the earliest gospel, Mark, where Jesus makes implicit claims of divinity understood in those terms by his adversaries. He uses historiographical methods to determine the probability of the different elements in these two passages and the overall probability that the implicit claims of divinity are highly evidenced facts. The two passages he considers are Mark 2:1-12, the healing of the paralytic, and Mark 14:53-65, Jesus examination before the Jewish Sanhedrin.

In the first part of the book, he discusses his historiographical methods and the rules of evidence he and other historians use in investigating Jesus. He sets out seven rules of evidence which he will apply: 1. multiple attestation; 2. dissimilarity (from both Jewish sources and subsequent church sources; 3. rejection and execution; 4. coherence; 5. embarrassment (elements that would be embarrassing to the church); 6. contextual plausibility; and 7. inherent ambiguity.

In Part Two, he examines the healing of the paralytic. He identifies five historical facts that he believes are at least highly probable: Jesus reputation as a miracle worker, the core scene, Jesus forgiveness saying, the scribal response, and Jesus authority saying. The conclusion was that it is highly probable, historically, that Jesus exercises divine authority to forgive sin.

In similar fashion he applies the rules of evidence to examine five historical facts in the Jewish examination of Jesus. Firstly, the authenticity of Jesus rejection by Jewish leaders and crucifixion, which he deems certainly historical. Then the remaining four facts are highly probable: the authenticity of the core scene, the authenticity of the high priest’s question, the authenticity of Jesus’ reply, and the authenticity of the blasphemy charge. Again, he concludes it was highly probable that Jesus spoke of himself as the Son of the Blessed. Likewise, it’s highly probable that his adversaries understood this as a blasphemous assertion of deity.

Then, in the final part of the book, he assesses this conclusion against those of Bart Ehrman, Tobias Hagerland, and Daniel Kirk. He found that in terms of plausibility, scope, explanatory power, and the use of less ad hoc, his analysis came out better than each of these. He concludes that Jesus did implicitly say he was God, and there are good historical grounds to believe this. And this was believed by the earliest Christians, not made up in later years.

All this stands and falls on the validity of his historiography. Can the probability of the core facts of these passages be established using the methods he uses? As far as I can tell, he uses methods used by others. I would like more discussion of why others reach different conclusions. I do appreciate the engagement with other prominent scholars. Above all, he gives even firmer grounds for those of us who have used these passages to argue Christ’s deity. He likewise provides a good basis for the conviction that this idea came from Jesus himself. He does all this carefully and methodically. This is a valuable and encouraging study.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Hard Feelings

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Hard Feelings" by Daniel Smith.

Hard Feelings

Hard Feelings, Daniel Smith. Simon & Schuster (ISBN: 9781982103903) 2026.

Summary: We are inclined to suppress negative emotions but if we listen to what they are saying about ourselves, we gain wisdom.

Daniel Smith received two unusual gifts for his fortieth birthday. One was a 1621 book, The Anatomy of Melancholy. The other was a coffee table book of the strange, lurid art of Hieronymus Bosch. He shelved the books away but couldn’t forget them. He’d wrestled with what one might call “negative emotions” all his life, and most dramatically after his divorce several years earlier, that sent him in a tailspin. But he couldn’t shelve the negative emotions these represented. Neither could he wallow in them. As a therapist, he was coming to understand that the place to begin was to be curious about them and what they were pointing to, perhaps in his own life.

Before he gets into specific emotions he first explores the morality of emotions and theories about emotions. All to often, emotions were divided into good and bad, with the bad being immoral. Then he explores theories of emotions, considering both Basic Emotion Theory and the Theory of Constructed Emotion. The former proposes that we are wired to respond in certain ways to different experiences, the latter, that how we respond is shaped by our interpretation of experience. Smith favors the latter and believes we need to “understand the complex structures and patterns” that underlie our emotions.

In the remainder of the book, in two parts, he considers six emotions we might consider negative. Part Two considers annoyance, shame, and envy. Then Part Three looks at boredom, regret and despair. Smith combines autobiographical material with research to tease out what each of these emotions. Annoyance points to boundaries transgressed that could lead to anger. Smith realized the choice he faces to internalize the annoying–to become annoyed–and that he may choose not to. He discovers that shame feeds on hiding and is lessened with self-exposure. Then there is envy, which may point to a neglected desire, fueled by comparisons with others. Interestingly, he spends a lot of time discussing his wife’s struggle to not have others envy her!

One of the strengths of the book is Smith’s candor. For example he honestly describes his own boredom in parenting a young child. Yet he sees boredom as the underside of a life “pregnant with meaning.” Then, he explores the addictive element of regret that poisons our steps into the future. Finally, despair is the curving inward in which one luxuriates in one’s helplessness rather than accept help, to look beyond oneself. In the author’s case, this meant daily studying a linden in a nearby park.

Perhaps the greatest wisdom here is to acknowledge and listen to all our emotions for what they are trying to show us. Smith’s self-deprecating autobiography models that posture. However, at points, this felt meandering. I didn’t always feel that his discussions “landed.” But perhaps that is also the point. He and all of us are in a process of making sense out of our lives, one that doesn’t progress in neat, linear fashion. He is not one of those who has arrived. Rather, he is still on the way, a way he has illuminated with humor, honesty, and substance.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review through LibraryThing’s Early Reviewers Program.