Review: Stones Still Speak

Cover image of "Stones Still Speak" by Amanda Hope Haley

Stones Still Speak

Stones Still Speak, Amanda Hope Hailey. Revell (ISBN: 9780800746483) 2025.

Summary: Shows how biblical archaeology helps us understand the context of scripture, sometimes correcting misunderstandings.

Amanda Hope Hailey is a Harvard-trained archaeologist, speaking and writing as The Red-Haired Archaeologist. The focus of her work is to show how archaeological research helps us understand the context of the Bible. She does not treat biblical archaeology as a form of apologetics, providing confirmations of the truth of the Bible or of Christianity. In fact, she honestly admits where archaeology is unable to confirm things in the Bible, including the lack of evidence for Israel’s first three kings. For her, that doesn’t cast doubt on the biblical accounts. She writes: “Holy Scripture is God-breathed. It does not require or even request that humans dig into our planet’s crust to find physical evidence of its truths. It is Truth.” She also shows how what we have learned in archaeology sometimes corrects misunderstandings of Bible stories we learned in Sunday School.

After introducing the work of biblical archaeology, she walks through a number of familiar biblical accounts. For each, she offers background and context, often drawing on archaeology, but not always. She begins with the creation accounts discussing why there are two different accounts, as well as discussing key words like “day.” Her observation is that there was no editing or blending of the two accounts. She explores the various efforts to discover Noah’s ark and makes the common sense observation that after the flood, the ark probably provided building materials, since these would have been scarce. She sets Abraham in the Middle Bronze Age, discusses his sons, his travels, and his tomb.

When it comes to Joseph, she set him in the context of the Pharaohs as well as the invasion of the Hyksos, which set a precedent for foreign rulers. We also learn that a better translation for Joseph’s coat might be “long-sleeved” rather than “many-colored,” an artifact of the Septuagint translation. Haley considers possible explanations for Moses miracles, including the parting of the sea. She’s honest in saying we have no evidence, despite the proposed explanations.

When it comes to David and Goliath, many of our tellings exaggerate both Goliath’s size and David’s smallness. If he wrestled beasts in tending sheep, he was likely a full-grown adult. Likewise, Goliath probably was about seven feet–tall but not giant. Finally, slings were a potent weapon that could fling a stone at 150 miles per hour. Haley emphasizes how God had prepared David for this encounter. Considering the absence of evidence for Solomon, despite his greatness, she suggests his disobedience contributed to the disappearance of his name.

Then there is Jonah. While we have no clue what swallowed him beyond the “great fish” of scripture, we do know a lot about the Assyrian civilization and the city to which he went. She raises the intriguing question of what might have happened had Jonah preached more than his minimalist message. Likewise, we have no clue what happened to the ark of the covenant, other than it was carried off, “plundered” according to a deuterocanonical text. It’s not in an army warehouse! Haley also fills in the important history of the so-called “silent years.”

Finally, she touches more briefly on the New Testament. As have others, she observes the word translated “inn” more likely meant an upstairs bedroom used for guests. Instead, Joseph and Mary found shelter in a first floor living area, also used for the family’s animals. She discusses the sites of Jesus ministry and death.

What Haley emphasizes is how important contexts (and sometimes good translations) are to understanding the Bible. She offers a wealth of this in the text and sidebars throughout the book. However, I was surprised, and perhaps disappointed that there was not more archaeology. There are no images or diagrams. Given the title and subtitle, I was expecting more of that. But she does model how archaeology interacts with our study of scripture and other texts helping us understand context. And this is a good model for beginning students of scripture.

_______________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Paul and Imperial Divine Honors

Cover image of "Jesus and Divine Honors" by D. Clint Burnett

Paul and Imperial Divine Honors, D. Clint Burnett. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing (ISBN: 9780802879851) 2024.

Summary: Studies inscriptional evidence in three cities offering a nuanced treatment of the Roman imperial cult.

“Jesus is Lord; Caesar is not.” This statement by a prominent New Testament scholar summarizes the conflict early Christians faced in the Roman empire. In particular, it is assumed that Roman subjects were required to offer sacrifices to the Roman emperors, who were considered divine. Thus Christians faced a dilemma that could lead to alienation at the very least and persecution at the most.

While D. Clint Burnett does not disagree outright with this contention, he believes the actual situation was more complex and varied by the particular city considered. He does so on the basis of the inscriptional evidence from several Roman cities to which the Apostle Paul wrote: Philippi, Thessalonica, and Corinth. Specifically he surveys literary, epigraphic, numismatic, and archaeological evidence.

In his introductory chapter, he offers the example of another city, Gythium. He shows how imperial divine honors were “intertwined with the public lives of Greco-Roman communities and had political, economic, social, and religious components that one cannot neatly separate.” They were public, often part of festivals, and similar in character to worship of other gods. A key motive was to express gratitude for benefactions, not only to divinized deceased rulers but to their living counterparts, even though these often had not yet attained the status of divus. This was first accorded by the Roman Senate, and then adopted by local officials, though this varied by city.

After his introduction, Burnett devotes a chapter each to the evidence from Philippi, Thessalonica, and Corinth. In each chapter, he reviews the archaeological evidence pertaining to the imperial divine honors accorded different Roman emperors. Then, he considers the imperial cultic officials who were priests and benefactors, the location of imperial divine honors, and of what imperial honors consisted. Synthesizing this data, he then considers the implications for early Christians in each city.

Burnett concludes that differences in practice and the character of each city, as well as that of the respective churches resulted in different experiences. In Philippi, where conservative values ruled and imperial divine honors focused on the deceased divi (with the exception of Tiberias), proclamation of Jesus as Lord resulted in imprisonment for some. By contrast, Thessalonica saw their gods working through the Julio-Claudian line to prosper the city. Hence, they granted imperial divine honors to both living and deceased Julio-Claudians. The Thessalonian Christians’ aggressive evangelism jeopardized the harmonious status quo, leading to their mistreatment.

Corinth differed both in bestowing divine honors only posthumously and extended these to non-Julio-Claudians. What sets apart the Corinthian church is that non-believers in Corinth failed to see how counter-cultural were the gospel claims. This had to do with both the Jewish apocalyptic beliefs of Christians and the un-Christian behavior of some. Consequently, they were able to live peaceably in the surrounding culture.

Burnett’s study is valuable in two aspects. First, he helps the reader understand what the Roman imperial cult looked like in these different cities. While there were commonalities, it was anything but uniform. And second, he shows that the Christian experience of the imperial cult was anything but uniform as well. This does not undercut the radical implications of saying “Jesus is Lord.” Rather, Burnett shows that the reception of this message was shaped by local, and not just empire-wide factors. Likewise, the contrast between Philippi and Thessalonica on one hand, and Corinth on the other also underscores the matter of Christian faithfulness in forthright proclamation. The culture will not trouble the church whose proclamation is muted, unclear, and morally compromised.

____________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Visit Pauline Studies Reviews at Bob on Books for other reviews in the area of Pauline studies.