The Father of Modern India: William Carey, Vishal & Ruth Mangalwadi. Sought After Media (ISBN: 9798988783107), 2023
Summary: Proposes that missionary William Carey, and not Mahatma Gandhi, is rightly to be considered the father of modern India.
Vishal and Ruth Mangalwadi make a bold proposal that is no doubt controversial in some quarters. This is that the English cobbler missionary to India, and not Mahatma Gandhi, should be reckoned the father of modern India. Their opening chapter makes the case for what a sweeping impact Carey had on India. Not only was he a missionary who brought the message of Jesus, he was a botanist after whom a variety of eucalyptus is named and he brought the English daisy to India. He introduced the steam engine, the savings bank to fight usury, humane treatment of leprosy patients, printing technology, agricultural societies that laid the groundwork for the Green Revolution of the 1960’s. He translated important works and taught indigenous languages, liberating lower castes from high caste dominance that functioned by keeping them in ignorance. This also worked against the interest of British colonizers. He introduced the science of astronomy, countering superstition. He established lending libraries, pioneered forest conservation and crusaded for women’s rights including the ending of the practice of sati. He was the catalyst of a cultural transformation.
All of this was rooted in the conviction that India was a country to be loved rather than exploited. This led him to fight for practices like those above that contributed to cultural flourishing while opposing evil, exploitive, and unjust practices. He believed in the power of a gospel that proclaimed the dignity of all classes, of women as well as men as those loved by God and redeemed by Christ. This led to opposing practices of female infanticide, of language barriers that kept the poor in ignorance, and fostered female education, giving women increased economic power.
This work, while arguing for Carey’s influence on modern India, avoids hagiography. It can be argued that he used emotional manipulation to force his first wife against her will to come to India, threatening to leave her behind. She endured poor conditions and the loss of a child drove her into insanity, leading to a twelve year confinement until her death. It seems he was wiser in his second marriage to a Danish countess, who was much more in support of his efforts and a partner in them.
The book goes on to share how Carey’s faith provided the bedrock ideas of reform, contrasted with the humanists of his day. Carey saw this as a work of God accomplished through conversion. He also saw God as the source of all rationality, hence his focus on various disciplines of science education. As previously noted, he recognized how important was the language of the people, and not just that of the elite. His literacy efforts raised the status of Bengali, in which Rabindranath Tagore’s Nobel winning work was written. His worldview offered the premises for a modern society. His belief in a creator led to the emphasis on science. His belief in human beings in God’s image led to treating all human life as precious. His comprehensive efforts reflected a comprehensive view of the world shaped by his faith.
The tendency today is to lump Carey into Western cultural imperialism. The Mangalwadis challenge this narrative by showing Carey’s love for the country that often put him at odds with both indigenous and British overlords as he sought the flourishing of the nation’s people. At the same time they argue that Carey’s theologically shaped convictions led him to seek to supplant practices, whether harmful superstitions or the oppression of women or practices of health and hygiene, that increased human suffering and damaged the land and its economy.
This gets at the heart of the challenge of cultural relativism. The Mangalwadis argue that Carey’s work did transform India’s culture. Dare we say there are things in every culture that are evil and ought be rooted out? Is it not love to do so if it helps a society to flourish? How, for example, can we say that female genital mutilation is wrong and should be stopped, even though such practice has long been part of some indigenous cultures? The Mangalwadis argue that the change Carey brought both addressed evil and the country’s flourishing and that efforts to repudiate his influence (and his worldview) can lead to the dissolution of democracy, of egalitarian advances, religious liberty, and economic development.
I found the book an illuminating treatment of a cobbler who eventually taught several languages and had a transformative influence in so many areas. It makes a compelling case for how Carey’s Christian beliefs and deep love for the people of India was the source of his impact. In our post-colonial mood, I hope scholars and other readers will have the discernment not to uncritically tar all western mission efforts with the same brush. At very least, the Mangalwadis make a case for a closer look at Carey.
____________________
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.



