Review: Remembering Laughter

Cover image of "Remembering Laughter" by Wallace Stegner

Remembering Laughter. Wallace Stegner, afterword by Mary Stegner. Penguin Books (ISBN: 9780140252408) 1996, (first published 1937).

Summary: An early Wallace Stegner novella. What happens when Margaret Stuart’s sister comes to live with her and her husband.

In 1936, Wallace Stegner was an English instructor at the University of Utah. An announcement of a novelette prize offered by Little, Brown, and Company caught his eye. But what to write? In the afterword, Mary Stegner shares her role in relating the story of two gaunt aunts living on a farm with a young man who was the son of one of them, though which was unclear. From that family vignette, Stegner wrote Remembering Laughter. To their surprise, they learned he was the prizewinner. He won $2500, very handy when one had an eight month pregnant wife at home.

Turning to the story, Margaret and Alec Stuart owned a prospering farm in west Iowa. Margaret was religious and ran her household with a quiet rectitude. Meanwhile, her husband worked hard but also enjoyed a good laugh, made up stories, and a shared drink with his fellows. Margaret disapproved of the latter and endured the rest.

When Elspeth MacLeod, Margaret’s younger sister by seven years emigrates from Scotland to live on the farm (and hopefully marry a promising young man from the area), everything changes. At first, all is well with welcomes from everyone, including the insipid bachelor minister who Margaret wants to match with Elspeth. And Elspeth embraces her new life joyfully, throwing herself into household chores while describing her surroundings in language reminiscent of Willa Cather. It’s also clear she has too much spirit to for the minister.

Then everything changes with the surprise party Margaret meticulously plans for Elspeth. To get her out of the house, she asks Alec to take her for a long walk by the stream. Bad idea, as the interest each had in the other turns into something more. The rest of the novel plays this out. Key to it all are the choices made (or not made) by each character under the control of Margaret who keeps up the appearances (even with a child who doesn’t know who his parents are) at the cost of laughter in the home. The years pass until we come to the scene of two gaunt women preparing for a funeral that opens the novella.

This book was out of print for many years until re-published in 1996. None of my friends who like Stegner knew of it and I only found it by chance. I thought it so adept at exploring fraught relationships, actions, silences, and their consequences. It previews all the great writing to come from the pen of Wallace Stegner.

Review: My Mortal Enemy

My Mortal Enemy, Willa Cather. New York: Open Road Media, 2022 (Originally published in 1926).

Summary: The story of Myra Driscoll Henshawe, who forsakes a fortune to go with her love to pursue fortune and fame in New York City.

This enigmatic novella by Willa Cather has recently passed into ranks of Public Domain works. Published in 1926, it comes between The Professor’s House and Death Comes for the Archbishop and is strikingly unlike either. The novella length is one distinction. The setting another, and the lead character a third.

The story begins in small town Illinois where Myra and Oliver Henshawe return to the small Illinois where they started out, falling in love and deciding to forsake Myra’s family fortune to pursue their own fortune ande fame in New York. And by local standards, it appears they have made it, especially as seen through the eyes of Nellie Birdseye and her mother Lydia, who are invited to go back to New York for the holidays.

Myra is a patron of the arts, the opera, and knows many wealthy people. Her apartment is richly furnished. Yet the reality is that Oliver has been but a modest success, and little “gaps” show themselves in Myra’s facade–times of jealousy and anger and disappointment with OIiver. We see Myra’s unhappiness in her decision to take the train with Nellie and Lydia back to Pittsburgh, getting away from Oliver.

The second part of the story occurs ten years later in a western town. Nellie is working there and runs into Oliver Henshawe. She learns that Oliver lost his job and they have fallen on hard times and live in a small apartment with noisy upstairs neighbors in the same town. Myra is ill, and, as it turns out, dying of a malignant growth. Oliver tends her faithfully but nothing satisfies her. At one point, she rails on him saying, “Why must I die like this, alone with my mortal enemy?” Nellie hears all this as she takes it on herself to have tea with Myra regularly, taking her to a favorite lookout, where, in the end, she is found dead.

One the one hand, Myra is an enthralling character, certainly for Nellie. And yet through Nellie’s eyes, we see a woman who nourishes fantastic ambitions that she imposes on OIiver, who loving and diligent as he is, is unable to achieve. Yet I find myself asking, was Oliver really the mortal enemy? I wonder if it was in fact her own disappointment, and her unwillingness to forgive the man who disappointed her. Or rather, was it life itself, which failed to live up to her expectations, leaving her to die in a seedy apartment? It all seems a sad tale of a woman so obsessed with what she wanted that she never could see what she had.

Review: Watch With Me

Watch With Me: And Six Other Stories of the YetRemembered Ptolemy Proudfoot and His Wife, Miss Minnie, Née Quinch, Wendell Berry. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint, 2018 (originally published 1994).

Summary: Six short stories and the title novella centered around the Port William resident, Tol Proudfoot and his wife, Miss Minnie and their life on a rural farm, part of the membership of a rural community.

This one had me at the title, both for its length, and the “yet-remembered” part. For Ptolemy “Tol” Proudfoot was a memorable man–a big man of 300 pounds who seemed to be a-bursting out of his clothes, which looked disheveled within minutes of him donning them. He carefully farmed 98 acres, just enough and not two acres more. He was a good judge of horses and all livestock, as well as a good judge of people. Miss Minnie Quinch Proudfoot was as diminutive as Tol was large, but just as impressive. This book of short stories and a novella trace their life together and the lives they touched from the time they began to court until a few years before death parted them.

The first story introduces both of them and tells how Miss Minnie, who had had eyes for him as he for her, consented to let Tol see her home after the Harvest Festival. “A Half-Pint of Old Darling” renders the amusing story of how Miss Minnie, a local temperance movement leader, got pie-eyed drunk on some Old Darling whiskey Tol had bought for his new calves. “The Lost Bet” recounts the time Tol had the last laugh with a store owner who belittled him. Tol was great with livestock and could drive a horse with aplomb, but struggled mightily with his new Model A. “Nearly to the Fair” recounts their attempt to be driven by Elton Penn to the state fair, never quite getting there.

Tol and Miss Minnie never had children and the hospitality they showed to a homeless father and son during the height of the Depression showed the unspoken heartache between them. As the father and son are leaving, Tol half-jokingly says to the man, “We could use a boy like that.” After they left “Tol put on a clean shirt and his jacket, and cap and gloves. Miss Minnie began to clear the table. For the rest of that day, they did not look at one another.” With an economy of words, Berry expresses the bond between them, the diligence of their daily lives, and the unspoken ache they both felt. The last of the short stories recalls a riotous incident from childhood when the family was gathered at Old Ant’ny Proudfoot’s and the boys managed to dump both a cat and a dog down the chimney resulting in all hell breaking loose with the company. Told a few years before his passing with tears of laughter running down his face, “It was Tol’s benediction, as I grew to know, on that expectancy of good and surprising things that had kept Lester’s eyes, and Tol’s too, wide open for so long.”

“Watch With Me,” the final novella is another incident, from 1916, of those “good and surprising things.” Thacker “Nightlife” Hample was prone to spells. Prevented from preaching at the revival at Goforth Church, he comes by Tol’s place, spies an old shotgun that had been loaded to kill a snake, takes it and walks deliberately away, mouthing threats to kill himself. Tol and his nephew Sam and several others follow as a distance, as Nightlife walks on, oblivious of them while they are far from oblivious to the danger of the shotgun. They follow a day and a night, losing him in the woods only to have him come to the fire where they had fallen asleep, uttering Jesus’ words “Couldn’t you stay awake? Couldn’t you stay awake?” He then leaves, taking them in a big circle back to Tol’s workshop. It’s a fine story of human fidelity and frailty–of friends who drop their work to watch their “teched” community member, not sure what they can do, but realizing they needed to be there, even at risk to themselves. That’s what it was to be a “member” of this community.

This is a wonderful collection I never knew existed, introducing me to an older member of Port William. The fine writing says just enough to suggest the things Berry wants us to see–the wonder of marital fidelity with all its flaws, the attentive care to land and crops, and animals, and people that makes for a healthy place, and the laughable incongruities of life. We witness the gentle respect people show for one another’s fallibilities, where people are protected from the worst versions of themselves, offering them space for redemption and growth. Berry makes us long for what was in this fictional town, and what could be in ours. He gently poses the question of us of what it may be to be the Tol, the Miss Minnie to others. We miss what Berry is saying if we only long for the world around us to be like these people and fail to hear the invitation to be like them ourselves.