
How Did They Read the Prophets?
How Did They Read the Prophets?, Michael B. Shepherd. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. (ISBN: 9780802885418) 2025.
Summary: A study of Hebrew and Greek interpretations of the canonical prophets including Christian readings.
The author of this book observes in his introduction that the Bible has always been an interpreted book. Later texts interpret earlier ones. For example, 1 and 2 Chronicles interpret earlier histories of the kings of Israel and Judah. Michael B. Shepherd observes that this interpretive work continued in the scribal work on Hebrew and Greek texts of the Old Testament, in subsequent commentaries, including those discovered at Qumran, and by the new Testament writers.
In this book, Shepherd focuses on the prophets of the canonical Old Testament. He adopts the assumption and methods of James Kugel in his study of the books of Moses. Kugel contends ancient readers adhered to four assumptions: 1) the Bible is fundamentally cryptic; 2) the bible is one grat book of instruction and this a relevant text; 3) Scripture is perfect and perfectly harmonious; and 4) Scripture is of divine origin and inspiration. He looks at the ancient extant texts, including the Old Greek, the Masoretic (Hebrew) text, and the Septuagint. Shepherd also considers other early extant texts and targums as well as New Testament readings of relevant texts.
Shepherd applies this method to the prophets, offering chapters on Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the Book of the Twelve. Rather than offer a traditional commentary, Shepherd focuses on texts cited in the New Testament. He traces the various renderings of texts in different sources as well as how New Testament writers appropriated the text. Shepherd shows how these interpretations “prepared the way” for New Testament readings.
Shepherd’s concluding chapter, “Prophets as Exegetes” opens with some fascinating conclusions about the intersection pf prophets, scribes, and exegesis:
“The older conception of a scribe as a mere copyist has given way to a newer, more accurate view of scribes as exegetes and composers. The older view of prophets as preachers of oral messages has been complemented by an awareness that the concept of a prophet developed in such a way that the scribe became the new prophet. The result has been a greater appreciation for the role of scribal prophets in the interpretation and production of biblical texts. The prophet is essentially redefined within biblical literature itself as someone who exegetes biblical texts and then produces biblical texts on the basis of that exegesis” (p. 114).
Shepherd then unpacks the implications for the formation of the prophetic canon alongside the Five Books of Moses as well as for the “New Testament Prophets.”
For pastors, the chapters on the prophets are most helpful when one is studying a particular biblical text. I suspect access to Bible software that includes the various sources he references is helpful, but not necessary. For me, the concluding chapter was worth the price of admission as a discussion of canonical formation.
_______________________
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.



