Review: The Prodigal of Leningrad

Cover image of "The Prodigal of Leningrad" by Daniel Taylor

The Prodigal of Leningrad

The Prodigal of Leningrad, Daniel Taylor. Paraclete Press (ISBN: 9798893480221) 2026.

Summary: During the siege of Leningrad, a docent who had betrayed his grandfather finds himself in Rembrandt’s Prodigal.

At the beginning of the siege of Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), the Hermitage, one of the world’s great art museums, shipped the canvases of its collection eastward to a secret hiding place to keep them out of Nazi hands. In this work of historical fiction, the central character, Daniil, is a volunteer docent in the museum. But what does a docent do when visitors arrive but all that is left are the frames? He describes in detail the painting and the story of the artist and its composition.

The most famous of the masterworks was Rembrandt’s The Return of the Prodigal. It was the one on which Daniil spent the most time. The painting holds a personal attraction for him reflecting his dark past.

Daniil, as a newly married father back in 1920, had great hopes for his future as a university student. That is, until he was called in to be interrogated one day. His grandfather, Anatoly Ivanovich Aslanov had been a history professor who became a priest. He went underground and the authorities were seeking him, supposedly to “persuade” him to return to teaching. Daniil, in a moment of weakness, confesses that his grandfather joined the family for Christmas celebrations. They arrested the grandfather that day, sending him to the Gulag. And they still revoked Daniil’s university admission. He has carried the guilt of that betrayal all his life.

The narrative moves back and forth between the grandfather’s life in the Gulag and Daniil, mostly focusing on conditions during the siege. The grandfather sees his imprisonment as a call from God and himself as immortal until he finishes his work. Much of that is to rescue other prisoners from despair. At one point, he and another prisoner are confined in an underground confinement cell from which none had emerged alive. Yet they emerge, kept warm by God.

Taylor describes the conditions of the siege, where rations were grossly inadequate to keep people alive. Daniil and his friends Aleksandr and Lev buoy each other’s spirits. Eventually Lev succumbs to starvation and Taylor describes the agonizing journey Aleksandr and Daniil make across the city, weak themselves to bury Lev and his wife. One of the most moving (and historically accurate), moments was when Aleksandr and other musicians perform the premiere of Shostakovich’s Seventh Symphony, the ‘Leningrad.’ They mount speakers so that the Germans can hear the performance and the spirit of defiance of those in the city.

As Daniil weakens in his own body, he keeps telling the story of The Return of the Prodigal. He begins to speak of the spiritual significance of the painting, defying the censors. But will he believe that story for himself?

Daniel Taylor weaves a story that gives an unsparing portrayal of the Soviet Union under communism–the secret police, the Gulags, the effort to exterminate belief. He also describes the heroism of both citizens and soldiers who held out for 900 days until the Germans relented. But above all, he tells the story of both a faithful priest and the grandson who struggles with what seems an unforgiveable betrayal. Taylor explores whether the light of God’s goodness and mercy can reach the darkest corners of the Gulag and the troubled soul of the betrayer.

_______________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Henri Nouwen & The Return of the Prodigal

Henri Nouwen & The Return of the Prodigal Son (Stories of Great Books), Gabrielle Earnshaw. Brewster: MA: Paraclete Press, 2020.

Summary: An account of the crisis, transformation and subsequent writing process behind Henri Nouwen’s The Return of the Prodigal Son.

Many of us have been deeply moved by reading Henri Nouwen’s The Return of the Prodigal Son. Nouwen’s reflections on his encounter with Rembrandt’s painting of “The Return of the Prodigal Son” address our loneliness, our “elder son” resentments, our need for forgiveness and to know we are loved. Nouwen invites us not only to be loved, but to love as the Father loves.

Gabrielle Earnshaw explores how Nouwen came to write this wonderful book, the response to it, and how the writing of it changed the last years of Nouwen’s life. Earnshaw is well-qualified for this task she is the founding archivist of the Henri J.M. Nouwen Archives and Research Collection at the University of St. Michael’s College and current Chief Archivist for the Henri Nouwen Legacy Trust.

She traces the spiritual struggle of Nouwen to know he was loved that culminated in his collapse in front of a poster of Rembrandt’s painting and the series of life altering experiences that followed this initial encounter–the end of his work at Harvard, the extended meditation on the original painting in St. Petersburg, his call to L’Arche Daybreak, his strained relationship with Nathan Ball, breakdown, and recovery at the Homes for Growth.

It was during this time that he began to write about the painting and shared his writing with Sue Mosteller. Mosteller had invited him to L’Arche and stayed connected with him during his recovery. She affirmed the significance of claiming his sonship, but also challenged him to a further step that would prove transforming.

…I ask myself if the real call for you is the call to become the Father. Once the sons have made their unique passages are they not then ready to become like the Father, to become the Father? And truly Henri, aren’t you right there? Is that what this passage is all about? Isn’t this why you chose to come to Daybreak in the first place; because in your life journey you were more ready to be the Father and you knew somewhere in yourself that it was time to “put away the things of the son”?

With Mosteller’s help and wise counsel, he effects a reconciliation with Ball, with whom he shares leadership of L’Arche Daybreak. Earnshaw traces the difference in Nouwen after his return. She also recounts the writing process, work with Doubleday, his publisher, and the response to his book. It received little critical notice, despite pleas that his work was much like that of Madeleine L’Engle, reviewed in the New York Times. Sales grew slowly and steadily, fueled not by critical reception, but by word of mouth from readers. A paperback version further expanded circulation. Earnshaw even sets the book in the zeitgeist of the 1990’s.

Nouwen would live four more years after publication of Prodigal. He truly became father to the L’Arche community, not completely freed from his struggles, but growing into the father role. This was his most productive time of writing. His lifelong struggle with his sexuality continued, but his growing comfort as father allowed him the freedom to play a clown, and to care for the core members of the community. In his last years he became taken with the combination of freedom and safety in the trapeze act of the Flying Rodleighs. He even worked with them, but never had the chance to form his experiences into writing before his death from a heart attack in 1996.

Earnshaw writes both with scholarly care and deep insight into Nouwen’s journey of writing this book. One ordinarily would not think of an account of how a book was written as spiritually edifying. This was different because Earnshaw helps us enter into Nouwen’s journey with Rembrandt’s painting. She captures the “wounded healer” Nouwen, one who answered the vocation to become a father, even as he wrestled to believe in his belovedness. She traces the transforming process in his life, and the blessing he offered to the members of his community and thousands of readers. Reading this book not only points us to a classic. It points us to the Father whose hands rest on the prodigal’s shoulders and invites the elder son to share his joy.

________________________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary review copy of this book from the publisher. The opinions I have expressed are my own.