Review: The Future of Synodality

Cover image of "The Future of Synodality" by Kristin M. Colberg and Jos Moons, SJ

The Future of Synodality, Kristin M. Colberg and Jos Moons, SJ. Liturgical Press (ISBN: 9798400800160) 2025.

Summary: An account of the effort of Catholicism to move to a more open, participative and inclusive ecclesiology.

Synodality. Not a word on the tip of most of our tongues. But one that represents an important renewal effort within Catholicism. The word derives from the Greek syn = with and hodos = road. It translates as something like “journeying together.” Synods are gatherings of a Christian community, whether at local, national, or global levels, emphasizing an effort to include all voices, to listen together, discerning God’s way forward for the church.

Synodality characterized the leadership style of Pope Francis, even prior to his papacy. Amid crises that reflected problems within the Catholic hierarchy, on March 7, 2020, Pope Francis announced the Synod on Synodality. It would become an effort to convene Catholics at every level of the Church’s life throughout the world to discern God’s direction for the church. The process emphasized openness to all Catholics including a mandate for the participation of women. Diocesan and national summaries were compiled into continental summaries and finally a universal document, all the while seeking to preserve the participative contributions of Catholics.

The Future of Synodality sets out the history, prerequisites, process, and impact of the Synod on Synodality, a process extending from 2021 to 2024. The book begins with asking why synodality? In response, the authors ground synodality on the foundation of the common baptism of the faithful, the idea of a journeying church, the guidance of the Holy Spirit, a pastoral ecclesial style, and a missionary vision of the church.

Then the authors trace the history of synodality. They find biblical foundations in the Acts of the Apostles, but trace the emergence to a crisis of leadership and the distinctive leadership approach of Pope Francis. Following this account, the authors offer snapshots of the Synod on Synodality–from the Synod logo, to the opening, where the synod process was set forth, through the local, diocesan, national, continental assemblies to the final General Assembly.

Perhaps the most impressive part of this account was the summary of what the church heard. Rather than a disparate list of conflicting concerns, the authors speak of the sensus fidei–an instinct of faith in which the faithful discerned what was of God, distilled into five themes:

  1. A need for formation
  2. A desire for the church to be more welcoming and inclusive
  3. A new style of being church and a new style of leadership
  4. The centrality of the liturgy
  5. Women

The authors elaborate each of these in their summary.

The second part of the book addresses how the Church may move from synodality as a moment in time to an ongoing quality of the church. Firstly, this requires personal conversion of attitudes and behavior, moving from hierarchical norms to ongoing willingness to listen to the people of God. Secondly, structural conversion is necessary. How will the participatory decision-making of synods transform the top down decision-making style of the Church? Finally, in the area of practices, how will the ongoing communal life of the Church translate into continuing synodality?

I suspect many of us who are not Catholic were unaware of this process. From conversations with Catholic friends, I sense that there is a deep renewal going on within Catholicism. The global journey together of this Synod seems a significant part of that. But it seems to me that the test will be the long-term “conversion” of the hierarchy. However, the empowering of parish and diocese, of women and other marginalized Catholics, may well spur a ground-upward transformation.

The process is also a model for non-Catholics. From congregation to denomination, the journeying together image of synodality is desperately needed. Protestantism is overrun with celebrity pastors more interested in followings than the formation of their people. Similar crises of sexual abuse stem from similar self protective hierarchies. The Synod on Synodality recognized the gift of the Spirit of God to the people of God. It affirmed the equality of all the baptized, and their shared mission. My hope is that not only may this movement continue to flourish within Catholicism under Pope Leo XIII. I also hope that we may all earn from each other on our journey with God.

_______________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Renaissance

RenaissanceRenaissance, Os Guinness. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2014.

Summary: Against the doomsayers speaking of the darkness of the times, Guinness remains hopeful for a spiritual and cultural renaissance in the west, rooted in the power of the Christian message; and he charts the tasks of faithful witness that precede this and the contours of such a renaissance.

Renaissance. Often the ideas of renaissance and the Christian faith are placed in opposition to one another with enlightenment, high culture and reason on one side and faith and superstition on the other. Guinness begins this book with arguing that in fact, renaissance is a deeply Christian idea, signifying a rebirth, a renewal that is in fact at the heart of the message of the Christian faith. Thus, unlike some who decry what they see as a declining western culture and at the same time, the eclipse of western Christianity, Guinness remains hopeful for the possibility of spiritual and cultural renewal in the west, and the global impact of the Christian faith.

He sees the church as at an “Augustinian moment” where one age and civilization is passing and what is to emerge remains to be seen. In this moment, he sees Christians needing to come to terms with globalization, the challenge of embracing global Christian faithfulness instead of cultural captivities of North and South, and finally, a trust in the continuing sovereignty of God. In his second chapter, he goes on to further delineate what he sees as the global tasks of the church in this moment. One is to prepare (or rather warn off from the materialism and metrics focus of the North) the church in the South. This is one place where I would have liked Guinness to consider more the possibilities of the potential for the witness of the church in the Majority World to challenge the west, particularly in light of the second task he enumerates of winning back the western world. Finally, he speaks eloquently of concern for the human future.

The next two chapters consider the cultural power of Christianity. Chapter three shows how on one hand, Christianity is unnecessary to the creation of cultural goods, which may arise apart from Christian influence and ought to be affirmed by Christians. At the same time, he speaks of the unlikely cultural impact of the Jewish carpenter and the movement he left, and its undeniable impact in philanthropy, reform movements, the rise of the university, modern science, and human rights. He argues in chapter four that the secret of such cultural power is the unique tension within Christianity of being both in and yet not part of the world, to be both world-affirming, and world-denying.

The last two chapters then consider then the grounds for hopefulness when facing the challenges of the present time. Over against the current wisdom of scholarship that culture influence comes through leadership, through the ‘centers’ of society, and through networks, which Guinness does not dispute, he argues for the continuing power of the Spirit of God who leads unlikely individuals into culture-transforming roles, from bringing the gospel to Africa and Europe in the first century down to the present day. He argues for the “great reversals” where those least imagined might play the greatest role. And he argues that cultural renewal is a by-product of great ideas about God and his purposes. In chapter six, he then contends that the “golden age” is not some time in the past but yet before us, and not in the sweet by-and-by. Rather, he holds out hope that the power of the gospel, the Christian message, may indeed surprise us, that it is often darkest before the dawn, and that we go forward by first going back to first principles.

The book concludes with the “Evangelical Manifesto” a document signed by a number of evangelical leaders, in the drafting of which Guinness had a significant part. It restates the core marks of evangelicalism, repents from some of the cultural captivities of western evangelicalism and marks out the key tasks of faithfulness before this community.

Guinness has been one of those voices in my life who brings clarity to “understanding the present time” from his Dust of Death, which made sense to me of the culture of the Seventies while I was a student, down to the present day. And while I found myself in sympathy with nearly all that is written in this book, I also found myself wondering if it is speaking to those beyond my generation, and beyond the white, western evangelicalism of my generation. The index of names references those with whom my generation have been in conversation for forty years–Barth, Maritain, and McLuhan, to name a few.

I wonder if the author is also engaged with younger writers from Thomas Piketty to James K.A. Smith, and those speaking from the Majority World perspectives like Soong-Chan Rah. I raise this because the author’s perspective is one I value, and one that should have a wider reach. I think this would be helped by a wider and more contemporary circle of discourse–not that he would concur with all of these ideas or writers, but that he would engage them. These and many others also care about the flourishing of human beings and cultures, and those who are Christians also seek the renaissance Guinness so hopes for. Perhaps such a confluence of discourse might even be the beginnings of such a renaissance.