The Weekly Wrap: May 25-31

woman in white crew neck t shirt in a bookstore wrapping books
Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

The Weekly Wrap: May 25-31

AI Laziness

A romantic novel in which the AI prompt was never edited out. A White House report on health citing non-existent sources. An article with summer book recommendations in which some of the authors existed but not the books attributed to them.

One might argue that each of these expose the flaws of AI. I suspect what they really expose is the flaws of the particular humans using this tool. Laziness that doesn’t carefully line edit, that doesn’t verify sources, and that doesn’t confirm the existence and availability of books. Similar to computer programming, AI is only as good as the prompts given it. “Garbage in, garbage out.”

Actually, AI has become quite good. A college professor friend now considers AI capable of writing at a professorial level. He shared examples of using AI in various forms of analysis of large amounts of material.

But one thing both of us are agreed upon is that AI offers a dangerous temptation to let it do our thinking for us. It may be a student writing a paper or an author cranking out a steamy novel. What we are doing when we let AI think for us is denying the intrinsic worth of thinking. For many of us, hammering out our ideas in writing serves to clarify thought.

Lest you think I am an AI Luddite, I do believe AI may be a helpful interlocutor in the process. I might ask AI to evaluate an argument for weaknesses or to raise counter arguments. It strikes me that when the chance to do this with real people is unavailable, this could be quite helpful. However, I am still thinking, and indeed, am forced to think harder and better.

I guess what it comes down to is that the ability to think and reason and create from our thoughts is one of the things that makes us human. I’m just not willing to give that up. I’m not ready to slack on the hard work of being a thinking human.

Five Articles Worth Reading

Alasdair MacIntyre, the philosopher, died recently. Charles Matthewes reviews his life and work in “Remembering Alasdair MacIntyre.”

“In a nation known for its relatively poor health, nearly everybody seems to be thinking about how to be healthy….” This line in “The Perilous Spread of the Wellness Craze” captured my attention. Sheila McClear explores the connection between our health care inequalities and the explosion of the wellness industry.

Nick Ripatrazone explores the decline of literary criticism in “The Art of the Critic.” Specifically, he argues for the importance of criticism as a benefit not only to audiences but to writers.

Geraldine Brooks is popular with many readers. Her husband died in 2019. In this interview, “Geraldine Brooks Is a Widow Now,” she talks about loss, grief, writing, and her Jewish faith.

Finally, the summer can be a great time to break out of our reading ruts. The New York Times Book Review has published a “Summer Reading Bucket List” of ten literary “to-do’s,” challenging us to see if we can check off five. The even include a copiable checklist!

…And a Video Worth Watching

The Covenant of Water was one of my favorite books of 2024. I have Cutting for Stone on my reading stack. On Thursday, physician and author Abraham Verghese gave the commencement address at Harvard. One of his pieces of advice for students was to commend the importance of reading novels. As an immigrant to the U.S., he also had some thoughtful and challenging critiques of our current political scene. In case you haven’t seen the video, it is worth watching, especially if you appreciate his writing.

Quote of the Week

G. K. Chesterton was born May 29, 1874. I’ve often appreciated his wit and turn of phrase. This one has some good advice:

“Don’t ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up.”

Miscellaneous Musings

Regular followers of this blog may have noticed that I have been posting two reviews a day this week. One of these has been of a children’s book published by IVP Kids. What a joy. I’ve loved the combination of brilliant illustration, good writing, and especially the inclusive character of these books. The first book I reviewed, Jesus Loves the Little Children, typified this approach showing pictures of children from every culture as well as children with disabilities. The reason for the extra reviews? I wanted to review these books, compliments of IVP Kids, before passing them along to our church’s Little Free Library, which we’ve just set up.

I was thrilled to visit the new Barnes & Noble store in Dublin, Ohio. When I walked in, it took my breath away–it was huge and overwhelming at first. And it was packed. But I like how the different sections were set apart from each other, many with comfortable seating. Not only that, the cafe was huge. But there was one drawback: the checkout and service counter was smaller than in the old store. And the lines were long.

I like the writing of Amor Towles. And I love bookstores, in case you haven’t noticed. I enjoyed this brief video clip of Towles supporting BINC, a national foundation supporting independent booksellers.

Next Week’s Reviews

Monday: The Month in Reviews: May 2025

Tuesday: Ian Harber, Walking Through Deconstructioin

Wednesday: Josephine Quinn, How the World Made the West

Thursday: Brian Goldstone, There is No Place For Us

Friday: Terence Halliday and K.K. Yeo, eds., Justice and Rights

So, that’s The Weekly Wrap for May 25-31, 2025!

Find past editions of The Weekly Wrap under The Weekly Wrap heading on this page

Review: Your Body is a Revolution

Your Body is a Revolution, Tara Teng. Minneapolis: Broadleaf Books, 2023.

Summary: Written by an embodiment coach and somatic practitioner, this book advocates for re-connecting with our bodies and names the different ways we have been estranged from our bodies through beliefs about the body, shaming, traumatic abuses, and political oppression and how we can learn to listen to and reconnect with our bodies.

Tara Teng is an embodiment coach and somatic practitioner who helps people who for one reason or another are disconnected from their bodies to learn to lovingly come home to their bodies. She describes herself as a “bisexual, biracial Asian American cisgender woman.” Much of the book reflects her journey from the beliefs and experiences that shaped her early experiences in a purity culture-oriented evangelical church. She experienced shaming having to do with her female body and the impact of how she moved and the clothing she wore on men in her church. She grew up with a spirit-body dualism that told her that spirit was good, the body evil. For her, it was necessary to move away from these beliefs to begin a journey of healing. Yet she mentions how compelling the incarnation of Jesus is for her, not only for his own embodiedness but that he was embodied through the conception, gestation, and birth process, carried and pushed out by a woman in all the messiness and wonder of birth. Mary’s labor was indeed a holy act.

She speaks of learning to express emotion repressed in the body and to engage in embodiment meditation that expresses those emotions. She discusses the responses of the body to trauma: fight, flight, freeze, and faun, and how traumas can shape whole cultures, especially minority cultures. She engages in an analysis of the way political power oppresses the body, whether patriarchy, Jim Crow, and capitalist oppression of labor. She also discusses the journeys of disabled people to show compassion on their bodies as given rather than be subject to those who would “fix” them.

In her thinking about sexuality, she has moved to a place of gender fluidity, allowing people to embrace the gender and sexual expressions they feel most fully affirm their sense of self. She speaks in great detail about sexual dysfunctions, with an emphasis on those who are anatomically female, and how these often reflect traumas and how somatic therapies can help uncover and heal these traumas. She describes the foundation of her sexual ethic “is to do no harm and leave people better than I found them.” Her ethic is rooted in consent, doing no violence, and listening to each other’s embodied boundaries to give and receive the greatest pleasure. She invites people to reclaim their erotic selves and the goodness of their sexuality, however they would express it within the above mentioned ethical and physical boundaries.

Her concluding chapters concern learning to be an advocate for one’s embodied self, the ways she has reconstructed her spirituality around non-violent practice, and reclaiming right relationships not only with people but also the environment, her “non-human kin.”

Teng’s narrative underscores the terrible consequences of the history of Christianity’s distorted theologies of the body, including the mind-body dualism that was more Greek than Christian. She rightly intuits that in both creation and incarnation, there is a basis for the goodness of our embodiedness as well as right relationships with the rest of our physical world. There is so much in her work that I would affirm.

There are some places where I have reservations. One is that she draws upon a Marxist critique of the exploitation of capitalism on bodies. That, in itself may be warranted, but it needs to be turned on countries that have embraced Marxism in some form as well, which if anything have been far more exploitive of bodies. As much as I would join her in affirming the goodness of our sexuality and the pleasure the body affords, I would differ on matters of gender fluidity. Apart from relatively rare cases of gender ambiguity, the givenness of our bodies, our very embodied character often clashes with gender fluidity, as many feminist groups have observed. Also, working in university settings, I’m aware of how complicated the idea of “consent” can be–how fraught with contradictions it may be in many situations in which students find themselves. I’d hope we might have conversation about such things without pulling out “shaming” or “phobic” language.

The other, perhaps more substantive criticism I would make of this book as someone approaching the end of my seventh decade is the obliviousness of this book to older bodies, which are also good and may be delighted in with their wrinkles, crepe-y skin, and creaky joints. I wished and waited in vain for her to address agism and the forms of oppression imposed upon older bodies, not only in care facilities but in daily life. I would cite the difference between having physical therapy with a twenty-something versus a fifty-something who is far more acquainted with the realities as well as the potentials of older bodies. I would cite the attempts to scam me simply because of the color of my hair, the perception of my age. While we may be aware of changes, we also continue to derive great joy and pleasure in our bodies yet are also subject to forms of shaming, oppression, and abuse. This also needs to be named.

I want to acknowledge, despite my critiques, that this book made me think. I found many of the exercises helpful in listening to my body. Teng helps us discover how good our bodies are. She rightly challenges the defective theologies, practices and abuses of the church that have inflicted so much harm. Where we differed, or when I found myself ill at ease with an idea, she challenged me to figure out why. I read too many books that never do that so I valued this. I’m heartened with the growing interest in Christian circles on embodiment. I hope the critique and the alternatives writers like Teng pose lead to a ressourcement, a return to the sources and a recovery of a far more Hebraic understanding of the body, the vision undergirding the Jewish and Christian scriptures.

________________________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary review copy of this book from the publisher through LibraryThing’s Early Reviewers Program.